Wong W, Morris P J, Wood K J
Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, United Kingdom.
Transplantation. 1996 Nov 27;62(10):1462-8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199611270-00014.
Bone marrow cells may be a useful vehicle for pretransplant delivery of alloantigen to induce tolerance in vivo. However, infusion of fully allogeneic bone marrow cells carries the risk of graft-versus-host disease. In order to reduce this risk while retaining the tolerogenic potential of the bone marrow infusion, we have investigated the ability of recipient bone marrow cells expressing a single donor MHC class I antigen to induce specific unresponsiveness in vivo. We show that 5x10(7) and 5x10(6) bone marrow cells from a transgenic strain of CBA mice, CBK, that express a single donor class I MHC gene, H2Kb (H2k + H2Kb), were able to induce long term survival of a fully allogeneic C57BL/10 (H2b) cardiac allograft in 80% and 20% of unmanipulated CBA (H2k) recipients, respectively, when administered intravenousely on the day of transplantation. In contrast, the same doses of fully allogeneic C57BL/10 donor bone marrow were completely ineffective at prolonging graft survival. When the interval between bone marrow infusion and transplantation was increased to 14 days, CBK bone marrow at either dose (5x10(6) and 5x10(7)) induced long term survival of C57BL/10 cardiac allografts in all recipients (MST>100 days) while fully allogeneic donor bone marrow was ineffective (MST=7, 5x10(6) cells; MST=6, 5x10(7)). Only when 27 or 42 days had elapsed between bone marrow infusion and transplantation did fully allogeneic bone marrow exert a beneficial effect on graft survival. Administration of 5x10(6) C57BL/10 bone marrow cells 27 and 42 days before transplantation resulted in long term survival of C57BL/10 hearts in 67% and 75% of CBA recipients. Next, we investigated whether manipulating the periphery of the recipient with a depleting anti-Cd4(4) monoclonal antibody before bone marrow infusion would facilitate the induction of unresponsiveness. When pretreatment with bone marrow cells was combined with anti-Cd4 monoclonal antibody 28 days before transplantation, a 10-fold reduction in the number of either C57BL/10 or CBK bone marrow cells required to induce tolerance was observed. These data confirm that bone marrow is a suitable vehicle for alloantigen delivery at the time of, or before, transplantation, on its own or in combination with anti-Cd4. The use of recipient type bone marrow cells expressing one or more donor MHC genes may be more effective than fully allogeneic, donor bone marrow cells in inducing tolerance in vivo. This difference may have important clinical implications for the current trials of donor bone marrow given at the time of transplantation in order to augment chimerism and to prolong graft survival.
骨髓细胞可能是移植前体内递送同种异体抗原以诱导耐受性的有用载体。然而,输注完全异基因的骨髓细胞存在移植物抗宿主病的风险。为了在保留骨髓输注的致耐受性潜力的同时降低这种风险,我们研究了表达单一供体MHC I类抗原的受体骨髓细胞在体内诱导特异性无反应性的能力。我们发现,来自CBA小鼠转基因品系CBK的5×10⁷和5×10⁶骨髓细胞,其表达单一供体I类MHC基因H2Kb(H2k + H2Kb),在移植当天静脉注射时,分别能够使80%和20%未处理的CBA(H2k)受体中完全异基因的C57BL/10(H2b)心脏移植物长期存活。相比之下,相同剂量的完全异基因C57BL/10供体骨髓在延长移植物存活方面完全无效。当骨髓输注与移植之间的间隔增加到14天时,两种剂量(5×10⁶和5×10⁷)的CBK骨髓在所有受体中均诱导C57BL/10心脏移植物长期存活(中位存活时间>MST>100天),而完全异基因供体骨髓则无效(5×10⁶细胞时MST = 7;5×10⁷细胞时MST = 6)。只有当骨髓输注与移植之间间隔27天或42天时,完全异基因骨髓才对移植物存活产生有益影响。在移植前27天和42天给予5×10⁶个C57BL/10骨髓细胞,分别使67%和75%的CBA受体中C57BL/10心脏长期存活。接下来,我们研究了在骨髓输注前用耗竭性抗Cd4单克隆抗体处理受体外周是否会促进无反应性的诱导。当在移植前28天用骨髓细胞预处理与抗Cd4单克隆抗体联合使用时,观察到诱导耐受性所需的C57BL/10或CBK骨髓细胞数量减少了10倍。这些数据证实,骨髓是移植时或移植前递送同种异体抗原的合适载体,单独使用或与抗Cd4联合使用均可。使用表达一个或多个供体MHC基因的受体型骨髓细胞在体内诱导耐受性可能比完全异基因的供体骨髓细胞更有效。这种差异可能对目前在移植时给予供体骨髓以增强嵌合体和延长移植物存活的试验具有重要的临床意义。