Suppr超能文献

[终末期慢性尿毒症治疗引发的伦理问题]

[Ethical problems posed by treatments of terminal chronic uremia].

作者信息

Jacobs C

出版信息

Presse Med. 1996 Oct 12;25(30):1359-62.

PMID:8958854
Abstract

Among about 650,000 patients treated worldwide by maintenance dialysis methods for end-stage renal failure, approximately 85% undergo hemodialysis and 15% peritoneal dialysis. For the 25,000 patients thus treated in France in 1991, expenditures ranged between 8 to 10 billion French Francs. These socio-economic factors necessarily generate a conflict between resource allotment and medical ethics. One of the questionable options requiring decisions at the onset of treatment is the patient's age. An age-based patient selection is actually unfounded. In a recent French cohort of 213 patients treated exclusively with peritoneal dialysis and whose mean age at start of treatment was 79 +/- 4 years, the survival rate at three years was 45%. Patient selection for either a given mode or abstention from treatment should be based on a careful analysis of comorbidities associated with end stage renal failure. This selection process is sometimes very difficult to achieve successfully since some patients initially considered as being in an irreversible condition may greatly improve their status after a few weeks or months of dialysis. The dilemma is to decide whether or not initiate dialysis or to "give the patient a chance", looking forward to discontinue the treatment if no significant improvement is obtained. A successful kidney transplantation is widely accepted as the best treatment for end-stage renal failure. Unfortunately the number of organ donors (mainly cadaveric) remains insufficient to meet the demand, again raising a difficult issue of patient selection. In the future, further complex problems will emerge with the introduction of xenotransplantation. These and many other issues, including availability of treatments in developing countries have been and will continue to be subjects for debate among nephrologists, the medical community at large and also health care authorities as well as equipment manufacturers, with the ultimate aim of providing low-cost treatment for all the patients in the world who require a long-term life saving therapy.

摘要

在全球约65万名接受维持性透析治疗终末期肾衰竭的患者中,约85%接受血液透析,15%接受腹膜透析。1991年在法国接受此类治疗的2.5万名患者,费用在80亿至100亿法国法郎之间。这些社会经济因素必然会在资源分配和医学伦理之间引发冲突。治疗开始时需要做出决策的一个有争议的选项是患者的年龄。基于年龄的患者选择实际上是没有根据的。在法国最近的一组213名仅接受腹膜透析治疗的患者中,治疗开始时的平均年龄为79±4岁,三年生存率为45%。选择某种特定治疗方式或不进行治疗应基于对与终末期肾衰竭相关的合并症的仔细分析。这个选择过程有时很难成功实现,因为一些最初被认为处于不可逆状态的患者在透析几周或几个月后可能会大大改善其状况。两难之处在于决定是否开始透析或“给患者一个机会”,同时期待如果没有明显改善就停止治疗。成功的肾移植被广泛认为是终末期肾衰竭的最佳治疗方法。不幸的是,器官捐赠者(主要是尸体捐赠者)的数量仍然不足以满足需求,这再次引发了一个艰难的患者选择问题。未来,随着异种移植的引入,还会出现更多复杂问题。这些以及许多其他问题,包括发展中国家治疗的可及性,一直并将继续成为肾脏病学家、整个医学界以及医疗保健当局和设备制造商之间争论的话题,最终目标是为世界上所有需要长期挽救生命治疗的患者提供低成本治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验