Holtzapple C K, Carlin R J, Rose B G, Kubena L F, Stanker L H
Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Mol Immunol. 1996 Aug;33(11-12):939-46. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(96)00050-8.
Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) and seven structural analogs were used to investigate the correlation between antibody binding and the conformational and electronic properties of these molecules. Mice were immunized with AFM1-BSA and hybridomas secreting anti-AFM1 antibodies were isolated and characterized. The cross-reactivities of seven structurally similar aflatoxins were determined by competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA). In an effort to correlate antibody binding with three-dimensional properties of the analogs, all of the aflatoxins (and the immunogen) were modeled and global energy minima were determined using molecular, mechanical and quantum mechanical methods. The results demonstrate that, for these molecules, loss of optimum structure and introduction of steric hindrance in the portion of the molecule that would fit into the antibody binding site are more important to binding than simply loss of a determinant group. Molecular computational techniques can give reasons for the wide variation in IC50 values observed between structural analogs and can be used as a tool for determining which conformational and electronic properties of molecules are most important for antibody binding.
黄曲霉毒素M1(AFM1)及其七种结构类似物被用于研究抗体结合与这些分子的构象和电子性质之间的相关性。用AFM1-牛血清白蛋白免疫小鼠,分离并鉴定分泌抗AFM1抗体的杂交瘤。通过竞争酶联免疫吸附测定(cELISA)确定七种结构相似的黄曲霉毒素的交叉反应性。为了将抗体结合与类似物的三维性质相关联,对所有黄曲霉毒素(和免疫原)进行建模,并使用分子力学和量子力学方法确定全局能量最小值。结果表明,对于这些分子,在适合抗体结合位点的分子部分中,最佳结构的丧失和空间位阻的引入对结合的影响比仅仅一个决定簇基团的丧失更为重要。分子计算技术可以解释结构类似物之间观察到的IC50值的广泛差异的原因,并且可以用作确定分子的哪些构象和电子性质对抗体结合最为重要的工具。