• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病房记录能否反映临终关怀的质量?

Do the ward notes reflect the quality of end-of-life care?

作者信息

Sulmasy D P, Dwyer M, Marx E

机构信息

Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1996 Dec;22(6):344-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.6.344.

DOI:10.1136/jme.22.6.344
PMID:8961119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1377116/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the accuracy of reviewing ward notes (chart review) as a measure of the quality of care rendered to patients with "Do Not Resuscitate" (DNR) orders.

DESIGN

We reviewed the charts of 19 consecutive, competent inpatients with DNR orders for evidence that the staff addressed a broad range of patient care needs called Concurrent Care Concerns (CCCs), such as withholding treatments other than resuscitation itself, and attention to patient comfort needs. We then interviewed the patient, consultant physician, house officer, and primary nurse and compared the ward notes with the understandings of these staff members.

SETTING

The medical service of an urban university medical centre.

RESULTS

The average number of documented CCCs addressed per DNR order was 1.1. The ward notes generally agreed with the perceptions of patients, house officers, and nurses (% agreement with notes = 79%, 77%, and 82%; kappa = 0.43, 0.40, 0.50). Consultant physicians' understandings were poorly reflected in the ward notes (% agreement = 59%; kappa = 0.18). They overestimated attention to CCCs compared with the notes (P < 0.0001) and with other observers (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Chart review for attention to CCCs accurately reflects the understandings of patients, house officers, and nurses, but consultant physicians report more attention to CCCs than is recorded in the ward notes or understood by other observers. Better communication regarding end-of-life care plans should be encouraged.

摘要

目的

研究查阅病房记录(病历审查)作为衡量对下达“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱患者护理质量指标的准确性。

设计

我们查阅了19例连续的、有行为能力的下达DNR医嘱住院患者的病历,以寻找工作人员处理一系列广泛的患者护理需求(称为并发护理关注点,CCCs)的证据,如除复苏本身外停止治疗,以及关注患者舒适需求。然后我们对患者、会诊医生、住院医生和责任护士进行了访谈,并将病房记录与这些工作人员的认知进行了比较。

地点

一所城市大学医疗中心的内科。

结果

每份DNR医嘱记录的已处理CCCs平均数量为1.1。病房记录总体上与患者、住院医生和护士的认知一致(与记录的一致率分别为79%、77%和82%;kappa值分别为0.43、0.40、0.50)。会诊医生的认知在病房记录中体现不佳(一致率为59%;kappa值为0.18)。与记录相比(P<0.0001)以及与其他观察者相比(P<0.0001),他们高估了对CCCs的关注。

结论

对CCCs关注情况的病历审查准确反映了患者、住院医生和护士的认知,但会诊医生报告的对CCCs的关注多于病房记录中所记录的或其他观察者所理解的。应鼓励就临终护理计划进行更好的沟通。

相似文献

1
Do the ward notes reflect the quality of end-of-life care?病房记录能否反映临终关怀的质量?
J Med Ethics. 1996 Dec;22(6):344-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.6.344.
2
The quality of mercy. Caring for patients with 'do not resuscitate' orders.怜悯的品质。照料有“不要复苏”医嘱的患者。
JAMA. 1992 Feb 5;267(5):682-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.5.682.
3
Differential medical and surgical house staff involvement in end-of-life decisions: A retrospective chart review.内科和外科住院医师在临终决策中的差异参与情况:一项回顾性病历审查。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Aug;32(2):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.02.009.
4
The quality of care plans for patients with do-not-resuscitate orders.有“不要复苏”医嘱患者的护理计划质量。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 26;164(14):1573-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.14.1573.
5
Long-term effects of ethics education on the quality of care for patients who have do-not-resuscitate orders.
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Nov;9(11):622-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02600306.
6
A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders.一项新政策的前瞻性试验,该政策取消了对不复苏命令的签字同意。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Dec;21(12):1261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00612.x.
7
Evaluation of a standardized order form for the withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房生命支持撤除标准化医嘱单的评估
Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1141-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000125509.34805.0c.
8
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.一项改善重症住院患者护理的对照试验。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究(SUPPORT)。SUPPORT主要研究者。
JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591-8.
9
End-of-life care in the general wards of a Singaporean hospital: an Asian perspective.新加坡医院普通病房的终末期关怀:亚洲视角。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Dec;14(12):1296-301. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0215. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
10
Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. How are they used and what is their impact?医院中针对重症患者的“不要复苏”医嘱。这些医嘱是如何使用的,以及它们有什么影响?
JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):233-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing Norton Sound: mixed methods protocol of a community randomised trial to address childhood hearing loss in rural Alaska.听见诺顿湾声:农村阿拉斯加儿童听力损失社区随机试验的混合方法方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):e023081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023081.
2
Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.晚期癌症患者与肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的决策比较。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):664-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022731.
3
A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders.一项新政策的前瞻性试验,该政策取消了对不复苏命令的签字同意。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Dec;21(12):1261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00612.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a procedure-specific do not resuscitate order form on documentation of do not resuscitate orders.特定操作的“不要复苏”医嘱单对“不要复苏”医嘱记录的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Jan 25;153(2):228-32.
2
Evaluation of a treatment limitation policy with a specific treatment-limiting order page.
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Feb 28;154(4):425-32.
3
Implementation of the patient self-determination act in a hospital setting. An initial evaluation.《患者自我决定法案》在医院环境中的实施:初步评估
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Mar 13;155(5):502-10.
4
Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization: implications for advance directive administration. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.住院早期缺乏决策能力患者的既往能力:对预先指示管理的影响。支持研究调查人员。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Oct;9(10):539-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02599276.
5
The 'Do not resuscitate' order. A profile of its changing use.“不要复苏”医嘱。其使用变化概况。
Arch Intern Med. 1988 Nov;148(11):2373-5.
6
The do-not-resuscitate order. Still too little too late.不要复苏指令。仍然太少且太晚了。
Arch Intern Med. 1990 May;150(5):1057-60.
7
Unanswered questions about DNR orders.关于“不要复苏”医嘱的未解决问题。
JAMA. 1991 Apr 10;265(14):1874-5.
8
A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care.一项关于维持生命治疗预嘱的前瞻性研究。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):882-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241304.
9
The quality of mercy. Caring for patients with 'do not resuscitate' orders.怜悯的品质。照料有“不要复苏”医嘱的患者。
JAMA. 1992 Feb 5;267(5):682-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.5.682.