McGraw P V, Barrett B T
Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, UK.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996 Apr;234(4):280-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00430424.
Techniques currently available for investigating retinal/neural function in the presence of media opacities have traditionally been assessed in terms of their ability to predict the level of Snellen acuity which will be achieved following therapy. We propose an alternative method of assessment in which techniques are evaluated in terms of their ability to pre-operatively distinguish patients with reduced retinal/neural function from normals. In order to demonstrate this method of assessment, the data from a paper comparing the predictive abilities of a white-light and a laser interferometer in patients undergoing capsulotomy [21] have been re-analyzed. The approach enables fair comparison of the predictive abilities of the various techniques and will therefore help to resolve the issue of which technique provides the best means of assessing retinal/neural function in the presence of media opacities.
目前可用于在存在介质混浊的情况下研究视网膜/神经功能的技术,传统上是根据它们预测治疗后将达到的斯内伦视力水平的能力来评估的。我们提出了一种替代评估方法,即根据技术在术前区分视网膜/神经功能降低的患者与正常人的能力来评估这些技术。为了证明这种评估方法,对一篇比较白光和激光干涉仪对接受囊切开术患者的预测能力的论文中的数据进行了重新分析[21]。这种方法能够对各种技术的预测能力进行公平比较,因此将有助于解决在存在介质混浊的情况下哪种技术提供评估视网膜/神经功能的最佳手段这一问题。