Suppr超能文献

后段疾病对振荡位移阈值以及使用潜在视力计和激光干涉仪测量的视力的影响。

Effects of posterior segment disorders on oscillatory displacement thresholds, and on acuities as measured using the potential acuity meter and laser interferometer.

作者信息

Barrett B T, Davison P A, Eustace P E

机构信息

Department of Optometry, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994 Apr;14(2):132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00101.x.

Abstract

Oscillatory displacement thresholds (ODTs) were measured in 67 subjects with clear ocular media, but known posterior segment disorders. The ability of these thresholds to assess reduced visual function, as quantified by visual acuity deficits, was compared with that of the Potential Acuity Meter (PAM) and the Rodenstock Retinometer (RR). ODTs were found to be sensitive to acuity deficits which were retinal/neural in origin. Despite the fact that interferometric acuities are, unlike ODTs, a measure of resolution, the RR proved no more accurate in assessing the level of letter acuity which existed than did ODT measurement. As would be expected, the PAM provided for the most accurate means of assessing non-optical visual acuity deficits. However, the PAM proved to be less useful in eyes with: very poor levels of acuity, and certain anomalous conditions. The results have implications for the relative ability of each of the three tests to identify reduced visual function behind cataract.

摘要

对67名眼内介质清晰但已知存在后段疾病的受试者测量了振荡位移阈值(ODT)。将这些阈值评估视力下降功能的能力(通过视力缺陷量化)与潜在视力计(PAM)和罗敦司得视网膜计(RR)的能力进行了比较。发现ODT对起源于视网膜/神经的视力缺陷敏感。尽管干涉测量视力与ODT不同,是一种分辨率测量方法,但RR在评估存在的字母视力水平方面并不比ODT测量更准确。正如预期的那样,PAM提供了评估非光学视力缺陷的最准确方法。然而,PAM在视力水平非常差的眼睛和某些异常情况下被证明用处较小。这些结果对这三种测试各自识别白内障背后视力下降功能的相对能力具有启示意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验