Stanford University: a prudent buyer case study of cost efficiency and quality of care.
作者信息
Franklin J C
机构信息
Total Compensation, Stanford University, CA, USA.
出版信息
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1995 Fall;33(4):49-67.
PMID:8964626
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Stanford University: a prudent buyer case study of cost efficiency and quality of care.斯坦福大学：成本效益与医疗质量的审慎购买者案例研究
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1995 Fall;33(4):49-67.
2
Stanford University's experience with managed competition.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Nov-Dec;23(6):136-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.6.136.
3
Case study: Southern Wine & Spirits. The employer as benefits connoisseur.案例研究：南方葡萄酒与烈酒公司。作为福利行家的雇主。
Bus Health. 1997 Dec;15(12):19-23.
4
Direct provider contracting: one employer's experience.直接供应商签约：一家雇主的经验。
Benefits Q. 1999;15(1):37-41.
5
Can managed care save Medicare? Achieving high quality and low costs through managed care.管理式医疗能拯救医疗保险吗？通过管理式医疗实现高质量与低成本。
Manag Care Q. 1996 Autumn;4(4):12-29.
6
Managed indemnity insurance--a clear choice for health plan sponsors.管理式赔偿保险——健康计划赞助商的明确选择。
Empl Benefits J. 1997 Dec;22(4):26-8.
7
Measuring the economic value of HMOs.衡量健康维护组织的经济价值。
Benefits Q. 1995;11(2):16-8.
8
Kodak develops a role in health cost containment.柯达在控制医疗成本方面发挥着作用。
Manag Care. 1995 Dec;4(12):55-6.
9
When the fine print changes. What should you do if your HMO cuts back on benefits?当细则发生变化时。如果你的健康维护组织削减福利，你该怎么办？
Newsweek. 1998 Mar 9;131(10):66.
10
Self-funded HMOs on the rise.
Manag Care. 2002 May;11(5):46D, 46F, 46H.
Zotero 插件