Hausotter W
Versicherungsmedizin. 1996 Aug 1;48(4):138-42.
A historical excursus seems sometimes useful to overlook actual problems in medicine. The example of the railway accidents shows the problems of the medical appraisal with regard to the consequences of an accident. After initiation of a third party insurance in Germany 1871 with reference to the new means of transportation a lot of people tried to get a compensation after imaginary or real injury following a railway accident. Very soon physicians had to give an expert's opinion on the complaints of those concerned. 1879 Rigler and 1918. Horn published monographs regarding this problems. Apart of real impairments very often complaints had no organic reasons. Oppenheim introduced 1889 the concept of "traumatic neurosis". The scientific discussion remained in the following decades and finally it was rejected until to our times. Today the terms "posttraumatic stress disorder", "psychogenic pain disorder" or "adjustment disorder" are valid. The discussions more than 100 years ago seem nowadays still actual. The terms have changed, the problems remain.
回顾历史有时似乎有助于我们忽视医学中的实际问题。铁路事故的例子展示了医学评估在事故后果方面所面临的问题。1871年德国针对新的交通方式引入第三方保险后,许多人在铁路事故后,无论是真受伤还是假称受伤,都试图获得赔偿。很快,医生就不得不对相关人员的诉求给出专家意见。1879年里格勒(Rigler)和1918年霍恩(Horn)发表了关于此问题的专著。除了真正的损伤外,很多诉求往往没有器质性原因。1889年奥本海姆(Oppenheim)引入了“创伤性神经症”的概念。在接下来的几十年里,科学讨论一直存在,直到如今这个概念仍被摒弃。如今,“创伤后应激障碍”“心因性疼痛障碍”或“适应障碍”等术语已被广泛认可。100多年前的讨论如今看来仍然具有现实意义。术语虽已改变,但问题依旧存在。