Hausotter W
Neurologisch-sozialmedizinische Praxis, Sonthofen.
Swiss Surg. 1997;3(4):142-8.
A historically excursus seems sometimes useful to overlook actually problems in medicine. The example of the railway accidents shows the problems of the medical appraisal with regard to the consequences of an accident. After initiation of a third party insurance in Germany 1871 with reference to the new means of transportation a lot of people tried to get a compensation after imaginary or real injury following a railway accident. Very soon physicians had to give an expert's opinion on the complaints of those concerned. 1879 Rigler and 1918 Horn published monographs regarding this problem. Apart of real impairments very often complaints had no organic reason. Oppenheim introduced 1889 the concept of "traumatic neurosis". The scientific discussion remained in the following decades and finally it was rejected until to our times. Today the terms "posttraumatic stress disorder", "psychogenic pain disorder" or "adjustment disorder" are valid. In present times the problem of the whiplash injuries takes the place of the railway accidents. Here also are either organic reasons discussed or psychogenic reactions presumed. The modern techniques in neuroimaging and neuropsychology are inconsistent and the results not generally accepted. In the individual case they are often little helpful. The medicolegal problems are still important and often reason for prolonged forensic confrontations. The discussions more than 100 years ago seem nowadays still actual. The terms have changed, the problems remain.
有时,进行一次历史回顾似乎有助于洞察医学中实际存在的问题。铁路事故的例子展示了事故后果医学评估方面的问题。1871年德国参照新的交通方式引入第三方保险后,很多人在铁路事故后遭受虚构或真实伤害后试图获得赔偿。很快,医生就得对相关人员的诉求给出专家意见。1879年里格勒和1918年霍恩发表了关于这个问题的专著。除了真正的损伤,很多诉求往往没有器质性原因。1889年奥本海姆引入了“创伤性神经症”的概念。在接下来的几十年里,科学讨论一直存在,直到现在这个概念才被摒弃。如今,“创伤后应激障碍”“心因性疼痛障碍”或“适应障碍”等术语被广泛认可。在当代,挥鞭样损伤问题取代了铁路事故问题。这里同样存在对器质性原因的讨论或对心因性反应的推测。神经影像学和神经心理学的现代技术并不一致,其结果也未被普遍接受。在个别案例中,它们往往帮助不大。法医学问题仍然很重要,常常是导致长期法医对峙的原因。100多年前的讨论如今看来仍然具有现实意义。术语变了,但问题依然存在。