• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[卧床患者需求评估工具的评分者间信度:国际文献综述]

[Interrater reliability of instruments for the evaluation of needs of bedridden persons: a review of the international literature].

作者信息

Kliebsch U, Brenner H

机构信息

Münchner Forschungsverbund Public Health-Offentliche Gesundheit, München.

出版信息

Soz Praventivmed. 1996;41(5):303-14. doi: 10.1007/BF01300436.

DOI:10.1007/BF01300436
PMID:8967169
Abstract

Objective and reliable rating of disability and functional dependence is of utmost importance for both medical and rehabilitation research and the practice of social medicine. The present paper provides an overview on internationally used disability scales and on studies that were carried out to determine their inter-rater reliability. Most of the scales were developed in the United States. The number and quality of inter-rater reliability studies strongly vary for various scales. In general, reliability was found to be high for summary scores of disability, whereas reliability strongly varied from extremely poor to excellent for single items of disability. This variation provides valuable suggestions for improving rating of disability.

摘要

对残疾和功能依赖进行客观可靠的评定,对医学和康复研究以及社会医学实践都至关重要。本文概述了国际上使用的残疾评定量表,以及为确定其评定者间信度而开展的研究。大多数量表是在美国开发的。不同量表评定者间信度研究的数量和质量差异很大。一般来说,残疾汇总评分的信度较高,而残疾单项评分的信度则从极差到极好差异很大。这种差异为改进残疾评定提供了有价值的建议。

相似文献

1
[Interrater reliability of instruments for the evaluation of needs of bedridden persons: a review of the international literature].[卧床患者需求评估工具的评分者间信度:国际文献综述]
Soz Praventivmed. 1996;41(5):303-14. doi: 10.1007/BF01300436.
2
Can the ICF be used as a rehabilitation outcome measure? A study looking at the inter- and intra-rater reliability of ICF categories derived from an ADL assessment tool.ICF 能否作为康复结果测量工具?一项研究考察了从日常生活活动评估工具中得出的 ICF 类别在评定者间和评定者内的信度。
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Sep;45(9):881-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1194.
3
Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of disability ratings based on the modified D Code of the ICIDH.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICIDH)修订版D编码的残疾评定的评定者间信度和评定者内信度
Int Disabil Stud. 1990 Jan-Mar;12(1):20-1. doi: 10.3109/03790799009166597.
4
[Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel Index, the Activity Index, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living: The use of ADL instruments in stroke rehabilitation by medical and non medical personnel].[巴氏指数、活动指数及诺丁汉日常生活扩展活动量表的评分者间信度:医疗及非医疗人员在脑卒中康复中对日常生活活动量表的应用]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Apr;43(2):75-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-814898.
5
An inter-rater reliability study of the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM).功能评估量表(FIM+FAM)的评分者间信度研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 1996 Jul;18(7):341-7. doi: 10.3109/09638289609165892.
6
[Reliability of expert assessment in disability evaluation within the scope of disability insurance].[残疾保险范围内残疾评估中专家评估的可靠性]
Gesundheitswesen. 1997 Apr;59 Suppl 1:34-41.
7
Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies.残疾评估中的评分者间一致性:再现性研究的系统评价
BMJ. 2017 Jan 25;356:j14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j14.
8
[Interrater reliability of expert assessment by the health insurance medical service in determining eligibility for disability benefits].[健康保险医疗服务机构进行专家评估以确定残疾福利资格的评分者间信度]
Gesundheitswesen. 1995 Oct;57(10):638-44.
9
The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study.功能独立性测量:一项比较效度和信度研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Jan;17(1):10-4. doi: 10.3109/09638289509166622.
10
Reliability and applicability of the ICF in coding problems, resources and goals of persons with multiple injuries.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》在对多处受伤者的问题、资源及目标进行编码时的可靠性与适用性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):98-106. doi: 10.1080/09638280701216862.

本文引用的文献

1
FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.功能评估:巴氏指数
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5.
2
STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.老年人疾病研究。日常生活活动能力指数:生物和心理社会功能的标准化测量方法。
JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016.
3
Functional assessment of nursing home patients. Reliability and relevance.养老院患者的功能评估。可靠性与相关性。
Eval Health Prof. 1986 Sep;9(3):339-60. doi: 10.1177/016327878600900306.
4
Functional decline in Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study.阿尔茨海默病的功能衰退:一项纵向研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Jun;41(6):654-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06740.x.
5
Interinstitutional agreement of individual functional independence measure (FIM) items measured at two sites on one sample of SCI patients.
Paraplegia. 1993 Oct;31(10):622-31. doi: 10.1038/sc.1993.101.
6
Inter-rater agreement of two functional independence scales: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale.两种功能独立性评定量表的评分者间一致性:功能独立性评定量表(FIM)和一种主观的统一连续量表。
Disabil Rehabil. 1994 Apr-Jun;16(2):63-71. doi: 10.3109/09638289409166014.
7
The rapid disability rating scale-2.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1982 Jun;30(6):378-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1982.tb02835.x.
8
Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community.社区中老年人功能活动的测量。
J Gerontol. 1982 May;37(3):323-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323.
9
Activities of daily living: reliability and validity of gross vs specific ratings.日常生活活动:整体评分与特定评分的信度和效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981 Apr;62(4):161-6.
10
Rehabilitation outcome: comparative analysis of different patient types.康复结果:不同患者类型的比较分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980 Aug;61(8):359-65.