Manning S K, Greenhut-Wertz J, Mackell J A
Hunter College, Department of Psychology, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Exp Aging Res. 1996 Oct-Dec;22(4):343-61. doi: 10.1080/03610739608254016.
Young and elderly participants, and participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD) were compared via the suffix paradigm, where a not-to-be-recalled item is appended onto sequences to be immediately recalled. This task was followed by delayed tasks. In immediate recall, AD subjects showed both extralist and suffix intrusions. Recall of auditorily as compared with visually presented stimuli was superior, with the difference increasing in older subjects. The auditory but not the visual suffix produced an end-of-sequence decrement, which was greater in AD than in other groups. After delay, the elderly and young showed virtually perfect performance. The AD participants showed relatively high performance; however, extralist intrusions were frequent, resulting in a relatively low hit rate. As in immediate recall, intrusions showed specificity for AD, and in this paradigm appeared to be a marker differentiating AD and normal subjects. However, the sample size limits the power and generalizability of these findings.
通过后缀范式对年轻和老年参与者以及患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)的参与者进行了比较,在该范式中,一个不被回忆的项目被附加到要立即回忆的序列上。此任务之后是延迟任务。在即时回忆中,AD受试者表现出额外列表和后缀侵入。与视觉呈现的刺激相比,听觉刺激的回忆更好,且这种差异在老年受试者中更大。听觉后缀而非视觉后缀产生序列末尾递减,AD组比其他组更明显。延迟后,老年人和年轻人的表现几乎完美。AD参与者表现出相对较高的成绩;然而,额外列表侵入频繁,导致命中率相对较低。与即时回忆一样,侵入对AD具有特异性,并且在该范式中似乎是区分AD和正常受试者的一个标志。然而,样本量限制了这些发现的效力和普遍性。