Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎中肩部功能的评估

Assessment of shoulder function in rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

van Den Ende C H, Rozing P M, Dijkmans B A, Verhoef J A, Voogt-van der Harst E M, Hazes J M

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1996 Dec;23(12):2043-8.

PMID:8970039
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

(1) To develop a simple outcome measure of shoulder function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the Shoulder Function Assessment (SFA) Scale; (2) to compare the properties of this scale with those of 2 existing measures of shoulder function, the Constant Scale and the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Scale.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients with RA participated in an inpatient multidisciplinary treatment program. The SFA Scale was constructed by selecting items considered simple to assess and relevant to shoulder function by a team consisting of a rheumatologist, an orthopedic surgeon, a physical therapist, and an occupational therapist. To examine the intra and interobserver reliability in 25 patients the SFA Scale, the Constant, and the HSS Scale were assessed twice by examiner CHME, in the other 25 patients once by examiner CHME, and once by examiner EMV. The validity of all 3 scales was determined by calculating the correlation with (1) the observed shoulder function, (2) the patient's opinion of shoulder function, and (3) shoulder joint deformity. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to determine the accuracy of all scales to discriminate between differences in the shoulder function of the "best" and "worst" shoulder as reported by the patient.

RESULTS

The validity and the reliability of the SFA Scale were equivalent to or better than the validity and reliability of the Constant and the HSS scale. The discriminative ability of the SFA Scale was superior to both other scales.

CONCLUSION

The SFA Scale is a reliable, valid, and accurate measure of shoulder function in patients with RA that can be completed within 3 minutes.

摘要

目的

(1)开发一种用于类风湿关节炎(RA)肩部功能的简单结局测量方法,即肩部功能评估(SFA)量表;(2)将该量表的特性与现有的两种肩部功能测量方法,即Constant量表和特殊外科医院(HSS)量表的特性进行比较。

方法

连续50例RA患者参加了住院多学科治疗项目。SFA量表由一个由风湿病学家、骨科医生、物理治疗师和职业治疗师组成的团队选择被认为易于评估且与肩部功能相关的项目构建而成。为检查25例患者中SFA量表、Constant量表和HSS量表的观察者内和观察者间信度,由CHME检查者进行两次评估,另外25例患者由CHME检查者评估一次,由EMV检查者评估一次。通过计算与(1)观察到的肩部功能、(2)患者对肩部功能的看法以及(3)肩关节畸形的相关性来确定所有三种量表的效度。构建受试者工作特征曲线以确定所有量表区分患者报告的“最佳”和“最差”肩部功能差异的准确性。

结果

SFA量表的效度和信度等同于或优于Constant量表和HSS量表的效度和信度。SFA量表的鉴别能力优于其他两种量表。

结论

SFA量表是一种可靠、有效且准确的测量RA患者肩部功能的方法,可在3分钟内完成。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验