Eltayara L, Becklake M R, Volta C A, Milic-Emili J
Meakins-Christie Laboratories, Montreal Chest Institute Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Dec;154(6 Pt 1):1726-34. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.6.8970362.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether expiratory flow limitation (FL), as measured by applying negative pressure at the mouth during tidal expiration, is a better predictor of dyspnea than routine spirometry measurements. The study population consisted of 117 ambulatory patients with COPD. Dyspnea was assessed according to the ATS-DLD respiratory Questionnaire. Expiratory flow limitation was measured in supine and sitting positions, and expressed as a percentage of the expired control tidal volume affected by flow limitation (FL, % VT). Using Spearman's rank correlation (rs), we found that the correlation of dyspnea scale with FL was stronger (rs > 0.5) than with FVC (rs < -0.3) or FEV1 (rs < -0.4) in both positions. In a multiple regression analysis FL remained the best predictor of dyspnea scale even after adjustment for FEV1 (% pred). Finally, FL was almost as sensitive as FEV1 (% pred) but much more specific in assessing the severity of dyspnea scale. These findings suggest that expiratory flow limitation as measured by the negative expiratory pressure technique may be more useful in the evaluation of dyspnea in patients with COPD than spirometry measurements.
本研究的目的是评估通过在潮气呼气时在口腔施加负压测量的呼气流量受限(FL)是否比常规肺量计测量更能预测呼吸困难。研究人群包括117例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)门诊患者。根据美国胸科学会-欧洲呼吸学会(ATS-DLD)呼吸问卷评估呼吸困难。在仰卧位和坐位测量呼气流量受限,并表示为受流量受限影响的呼出对照潮气量的百分比(FL,%VT)。使用Spearman等级相关性(rs),我们发现,在两个体位中,呼吸困难量表与FL的相关性(rs>0.5)比与用力肺活量(FVC,rs<-0.3)或第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1,rs<-0.4)更强。在多元回归分析中,即使在对FEV1(%预计值)进行校正后,FL仍然是呼吸困难量表的最佳预测指标。最后,FL在评估呼吸困难量表严重程度方面几乎与FEV1(%预计值)一样敏感,但特异性更高。这些发现表明,通过呼气负压技术测量的呼气流量受限在评估COPD患者的呼吸困难方面可能比肺量计测量更有用。