Suppr超能文献

持续性支气管哮喘患者的气道阻塞与慢性运动性呼吸困难

Airway obstruction and chronic exertional dyspnoea in patients with persistent bronchial asthma.

作者信息

Filippelli M, Pacini F, Romagnoli I, Rosi E, Ottanelli R, Duranti R, Scano G

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2000 Jul;94(7):694-701. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0803.

Abstract

In patients with COPD, flow limitation (FL) predicts chronic exertional dyspnoea (CED) better than routine spirometry. Whether, and to what extent, FL and CED are overlapping quantities in chronic asthma has not yet been defined. Forty consecutive clinically stable asthmatic patients without smoking history or cardiopulmonary disorders, were studied. In each subject respiratory function, including static and dynamic pulmonary volumes, was evaluated; maximal (MEFV) and partial (PEFV) expiratory V'-V curves and isovolumic partial to maximal flow ratio (M/P). FL was assessed in a seated patient by comparing tidal and PEFV curves; FL was detected when tidal flows were superimposed or exceeded those obtained during PEFV curves, and was expressed as a percentage of the expired control tidal volume (V(T)) affected by flow limitation (FL% VT). Dyspnoea was assessed by both MRC scale and Baseline Dyspnoea Index (BDI) focal score. Half of the patients were found to have FL. They were older, more dyspnoeic and more obstructed (P<0.03 - P<0.000005) than the non-FL group. FEV1, vital capacity (VC), age, body mass index, FL and M/P ratio were all related to dyspnoea scores. FL was significantly related to FEV1 (r = - 0.59). Multiple regression analysis showed that FEV1 (P=0.003, r2= 15-3% and P = 0.004, r2= 20.3%) and age (P = 0.0006, r2 = 26.8% and P = 0.016, r2 = 11%) independently predicted a part of the variance of MRC (P = 0.0001, r2 = 42.1%) and BDI (P = 0.0008, r2 = 31.3%), respectively. With dyspnoea scale being the gold standard, diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) by ROC (receiver operating characteristics) analysis was similar for FEV1 and FL. The results indicate that FL may be present in this subset of asthmatics. CED may not be easily explained by abnormalities of routine spirometry or FL, the largest part of the CED variance remained unexplained. Thus, routine spirometry, FL and CED in patients with bronchial asthma are only partially overlapping quantities which need to be assessed separately.

摘要

在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,气流受限(FL)比常规肺功能检查更能预测慢性运动性呼吸困难(CED)。在慢性哮喘中,FL和CED是否以及在何种程度上是重叠的量尚未明确。对40例连续的无吸烟史或心肺疾病的临床稳定哮喘患者进行了研究。评估了每个受试者的呼吸功能,包括静态和动态肺容量;测定了最大(MEFV)和部分(PEFV)呼气流量-容积曲线以及等容部分与最大流量比值(M/P)。通过比较潮气和PEFV曲线对坐位患者进行FL评估;当潮气量叠加或超过PEFV曲线时检测到FL,并表示为受气流受限影响的呼出对照潮气量(V(T))的百分比(FL%VT)。通过医学研究委员会(MRC)量表和基线呼吸困难指数(BDI)焦点评分评估呼吸困难。发现一半的患者存在FL。他们比无FL组年龄更大、呼吸困难更严重且阻塞更明显(P<0.03 - P<0.000005)。第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、肺活量(VC)、年龄、体重指数、FL和M/P比值均与呼吸困难评分相关。FL与FEV1显著相关(r = - 0.59)。多元回归分析表明,FEV1(P = 0.003,r2 = 15.3% 且P = 0.004,r2 = 20.3%)和年龄(P = 0.0006,r2 = 26.8% 且P = 0.016,r2 = 11%)分别独立预测了MRC(P = 0.0001,r2 = 42.1%)和BDI(P = 0.0008,r2 = 31.3%)方差的一部分。以呼吸困难量表作为金标准,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,FEV1和FL的诊断准确性(敏感性和特异性)相似。结果表明,该组哮喘患者中可能存在FL。CED可能不易通过常规肺功能检查异常或FL来解释,CED方差的最大部分仍无法解释。因此,支气管哮喘患者的常规肺功能检查、FL和CED只是部分重叠的量,需要分别进行评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验