Labinaz M, Sketch M H, Stebbins A L, DeFranco A C, Holmes D R, Kleiman N S, Betriu A, Rutsch W R, Vahanian A, Topol E J, Califf R M
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Dec 15;78(12):1338-44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00654-6.
Our purpose was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with prior coronary angioplasty who underwent thrombolysis for new acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries-I trial. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with (n = 1,647) and without (n = 39,150) previous angioplasty. The relations among prior angioplasty, clinical outcomes, and treatment effects were examined with logistic regression modeling. Patients with previous angioplasty tended to be younger and presented sooner after symptom onset, but had more multivessel disease and lower ejection fractions. Unadjusted mortality was significantly lower in the prior-angioplasty group at 24 hours (1.8% vs 2.7%, p = 0.03) and 30 days (5.6% vs 7.0%, p = 0.036). Although most of the survival advantage was due to low-risk characteristics in this group (lower age and heart rate and fewer anterior wall AMIs), prior angioplasty remained a weak but independent predictor of survival. Recurrent ischemia and reinfarction occurred more often in the prior-angioplasty group, as did bypass surgery (12.2% vs 8.5%) and repeat angioplasty (34.5% vs 21.4%). Patients with prior angioplasty and prior AMI had lower 30-day mortality than those with prior infarction alone (6.3% vs 12.6%, p < 0.01). Treatment effects on 30-day mortality were similar among patients with prior angioplasty (odds ratio 1.2 for accelerated tissue-plasminogen activator v. combined streptokinase arms, 95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.9). Patients with prior angioplasty who present with AMI have fewer in-hospital adverse events and lower 30-day mortality than those without such a history.
我们的目的是在“全球应用链激酶和t-PA治疗闭塞冠状动脉-I”试验中,评估既往接受过冠状动脉血管成形术的患者接受溶栓治疗以治疗新发急性心肌梗死(AMI)的结局。比较了有(n = 1,647)和没有(n = 39,150)既往血管成形术的患者的基线特征和临床结局。采用逻辑回归模型研究既往血管成形术、临床结局和治疗效果之间的关系。既往接受过血管成形术的患者往往更年轻,症状发作后就诊更早,但多支血管病变更多,射血分数更低。既往血管成形术组在24小时(1.8% 对2.7%,p = 0.03)和30天(5.6% 对7.0%,p = 0.036)时未经调整的死亡率显著更低。尽管该组生存优势的大部分归因于低风险特征(年龄和心率较低以及前壁AMI较少),但既往血管成形术仍然是生存的一个微弱但独立的预测因素。既往血管成形术组复发性缺血和再梗死的发生率更高,搭桥手术(12.2% 对8.5%)和重复血管成形术(34.5% 对21.4%)也是如此。既往有血管成形术和既往有AMI的患者30天死亡率低于仅既往有梗死的患者(6.3% 对12.6%,p < 0.01)。既往有血管成形术的患者中,加速组织型纤溶酶原激活剂组与联合链激酶组相比,治疗对30天死亡率的影响相似(比值比1.2,95% 置信区间0.73至1.9)。与无此类病史的患者相比,既往有血管成形术且发生AMI的患者住院期间不良事件更少,30天死亡率更低。