Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, Artaud D, Ramon P, Edme J L
Department of Radiology, Hôpital Calmette, Lille, France.
Eur Radiol. 1996;6(6):807-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00240676.
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of transverse CT scans as well as multiplanar (MPR) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions in the evaluation of obstructive lesions of the central airways. A total of 64 patients were evaluated for the presence of obstructive lesions of the central tracheobronchial tree with transverse spiral CT scans, multiplanar reformations (MPRs), 3D shaded surface displays (3D SSDs) and minimum intensity projections (MIPs). The findings of these modalities were then compared with those obtained at bronchoscopy. The severity, length, and shape of airway narrowing were analyzed comparatively on the four sets of images. Transverse CT scans and MPRs had a similar accuracy (99%) in detecting obstructive airway lesions. The accuracy of both was significantly higher than that of 3DSSDs (90%, p < 0.05) and MIPs (81%; p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between the four imaging modalities in the analysis of the morphology of airway stenoses. Symmetric stenoses were similarly analyzed on the four sets of images, whereas MPRs and MIPs failed to depict accurately simple and complex asymmetric stenoses. Transverse CT scans are accurate in the depiction of obstructive lesions of the central airways and may be complemented by MPRs and/or 3DSSDs in their morphologic evaluation.
本研究的目的是评估横轴位CT扫描以及多平面(MPR)和三维(3D)重建在评估中央气道阻塞性病变中的准确性。共有64例患者接受了横轴位螺旋CT扫描、多平面重建(MPR)、3D表面阴影显示(3D SSD)和最小密度投影(MIP),以评估中央气管支气管树是否存在阻塞性病变。然后将这些检查方法的结果与支气管镜检查结果进行比较。在四组图像上对气道狭窄的严重程度、长度和形态进行了比较分析。横轴位CT扫描和MPR在检测气道阻塞性病变方面具有相似的准确性(99%)。两者的准确性均显著高于3D SSD(90%,p<0.05)和MIP(81%;p<0.01)。在分析气道狭窄形态时,四种成像方式之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在四组图像上对对称性狭窄进行了类似的分析,而MPR和MIP未能准确描绘简单和复杂的不对称狭窄。横轴位CT扫描在描绘中央气道阻塞性病变方面是准确的,在形态学评估中可由MPR和/或3D SSD进行补充。