Razvi H A, Song T Y, Denstedt J D
Division of Urology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
J Endourol. 1996 Dec;10(6):559-63. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.559.
Although endoscopic lithotripsy of bladder stones has been well described and is widely practiced, comparison of the main modalities of mechanical, electrohydraulic, and ultrasonic lithotripsy is lacking. The exact role of these and other modalities such as the Swiss Lithoclast and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is not clearly defined. The safety and efficacy of the various lithotripsy modalities available to treat bladder calculi were reviewed retrospectively over an 18-year period. A total of 106 patients were treated with some form of intracorporeal lithotripsy. In general, all devices proved to be effective with a low rate of complications. The addition of transurethral resection of the prostate to bladder stone management under the same anesthetic was also found to be a safe procedure for moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia. In summary, transurethral endoscopic lithotripsy is a safe and effective method of bladder stone management both alone and in combination with transurethral prostatectomy. All modalities of intracorporeal lithotripsy are effective; however, devices such as ultrasound lithotripters or the Swiss Lithoclast that utilize larger, rigid probes may be more efficient for patients with large or particularly hard vesical calculi.
尽管膀胱结石的内镜碎石术已有详尽描述且广泛应用,但机械、液电和超声碎石术等主要方式的比较尚缺。这些方式以及其他方式如瑞士碎石器和体外冲击波碎石术的确切作用尚未明确界定。对18年间可用于治疗膀胱结石的各种碎石术方式的安全性和有效性进行了回顾性分析。共有106例患者接受了某种形式的体内碎石术。总体而言,所有设备均证明有效且并发症发生率低。在同一麻醉下,将经尿道前列腺切除术加至膀胱结石处理中,对于中度良性前列腺增生也是一种安全的手术。总之,经尿道内镜碎石术无论是单独应用还是与经尿道前列腺切除术联合应用,都是治疗膀胱结石的一种安全有效的方法。所有体内碎石术方式均有效;然而,对于有大的或特别硬的膀胱结石的患者,使用较大、刚性探头的设备如超声碎石器或瑞士碎石器可能效率更高。