Graham D I, Adams J H, Nicoll J A, Maxwell W L, Gennarelli T A
University Department of Neuropathology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Brain Pathol. 1995 Oct;5(4):397-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1995.tb00618.x.
The identification and interpretation of brain damage resulting from a non-missile head injury is often not easy with the result that the most obvious structural damage identified postmortem may not be the most important in trying to establish clinicopathological correlations. For example patients with a fracture of the skull, quite severe cerebral contusions or a large intracranial haematoma that is successfully treated can make an uneventful and complete recovery if no other types of brain damage are present. However, not infrequently more subtle forms of pathology are present and ones that can only be identified microscopically. A systematic and pragmatic approach through the autopsy is therefore required and one that recognises the need for tissue to be retained in ways that are appropriate for cellular and molecular studies.
识别和解释非导弹性头部损伤导致的脑损伤往往并非易事,结果是死后发现的最明显的结构损伤在试图建立临床病理相关性时可能并非最重要的。例如,颅骨骨折、相当严重的脑挫伤或成功治疗的大型颅内血肿患者,如果不存在其他类型的脑损伤,可实现平稳且完全的康复。然而,更细微的病理形式并不罕见,且只能通过显微镜识别。因此,需要通过尸检采取系统且务实的方法,这种方法要认识到以适合细胞和分子研究的方式保留组织的必要性。