Prince R L
University of Western Australia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.
Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59 Suppl 1:S20-3. doi: 10.1007/s002239900171.
History will probably describe this as a significant era for osteoporosis management, which has recently shifted from the laboratory and research clinic into mainstream clinical practice. It is timely, therefore, to provide practice guidelines for clinical use in this area; they must be developed carefully, however, so as to ensure that they are generated from reliable data. Furthermore, in current circumstances, management not only must be effective but also must aim for cost minimization; this is a difficult area in which little information is available. Also, in light of increased knowledge about skeletal medicine, complex cases should be considered for referral to an expert. The diagnosis of osteoporosis centers on two main steps: the identification of patients at risk and the estimation of bone density at two skeletal sites to help in ascertaining future fracture risk. At present, the main question in this approach centers on identifying the risk level threshold at which bone density should be evaluated. Although it is generally agreed that anyone with an atraumatic osteoporotic fracture will benefit from bone density estimation, the exact risk level for other, less easily defined indicators (e.g., cigarette smoking) is unclear. Once the diagnosis of osteoporosis is made, the cause must be elucidated by appropriate biochemical and imaging techniques. Appropriate therapy varies with the cause and level of risk. Although many treatments are currently available, including pharmacologic intervention, dietary changes, and exercise, they must be selected and adapted according to the needs of the individual patient, a process requiring both skill and patience.
历史或许会将这一时期描述为骨质疏松症治疗的重要时代,该领域近来已从实验室和研究诊所迈向主流临床实践。因此,适时提供该领域临床应用的实践指南很有必要;然而,这些指南必须精心制定,以确保其基于可靠数据。此外,在当前情况下,治疗不仅要有效,还必须力求成本最小化;这是一个信息匮乏的难题领域。而且,鉴于对骨骼医学的认识不断增加,对于复杂病例应考虑转诊给专家。骨质疏松症的诊断主要基于两个主要步骤:识别有风险的患者,以及评估两个骨骼部位的骨密度,以帮助确定未来骨折风险。目前,这种方法的主要问题集中在确定应评估骨密度的风险水平阈值。尽管人们普遍认为,任何发生非创伤性骨质疏松性骨折的人都将从骨密度评估中受益,但其他较难明确界定的指标(如吸烟)的确切风险水平尚不清楚。一旦确诊骨质疏松症,就必须通过适当的生化和影像学技术阐明病因。适当的治疗方法因病因和风险水平而异。尽管目前有许多治疗方法可供选择,包括药物干预、饮食改变和运动,但必须根据个体患者的需求进行选择和调整,这一过程既需要技巧又需要耐心。