• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光固化玻璃离子衬层/基底的牙本质粘结

Dentine bond of light-activated glass-ionomer liner/bases.

作者信息

Aboush Y E

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Bristol Dental Hospital and School, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Ir Dent Assoc. 1994;40(3):63-5.

PMID:8975046
Abstract

This in vitro study comparatively assessed the magnitude and durability of the bonds to dentine of three glass-ionomer liner/bases, BaseLine VLC, Vitrebond and XR Ionomer. Shear bond strengths to human dentine were measured after 24 h. storage in water at 37 degrees C and after 5,000 continuous thermocycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C. The BaseLine VLC material failed to achieve any measurable bond. The mean bond strength values of Vitrebond after 24 h. storage in water at 37 degrees C and after thermocycling were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of XR Ionomer. Both Vitrebond and XR Ionomer exhibited a drop in their bond strengths after thermocycling but this was statistically significant only in the case of XR Ionomer. These findings indicate that Vitrebond exhibits a more reliable bond to dentine compared to those of BaseLine VLC and XR Ionomer.

摘要

这项体外研究比较评估了三种玻璃离子衬层/基底材料(BaseLine VLC、Vitrebond和XR Ionomer)与牙本质结合的强度和持久性。在37摄氏度水中储存24小时后以及在5摄氏度至55摄氏度之间进行5000次连续热循环后,测量了它们与人类牙本质的剪切粘结强度。BaseLine VLC材料未能实现任何可测量的粘结。在37摄氏度水中储存24小时后以及热循环后,Vitrebond的平均粘结强度值显著高于XR Ionomer(p < 0.05)。热循环后,Vitrebond和XR Ionomer的粘结强度均有所下降,但仅在XR Ionomer的情况下具有统计学意义。这些发现表明,与BaseLine VLC和XR Ionomer相比,Vitrebond与牙本质的粘结更为可靠。

相似文献

1
Dentine bond of light-activated glass-ionomer liner/bases.光固化玻璃离子衬层/基底的牙本质粘结
J Ir Dent Assoc. 1994;40(3):63-5.
2
Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.玻璃离子水门汀与复合树脂组合的粘结强度
Quintessence Int. 1992 Sep;23(9):633-9.
3
Dentinal shear bond strength, microleakage, and contraction gap of visible light-polymerized liners/bases.可见光固化衬层/基底的牙本质剪切粘结强度、微渗漏及收缩间隙
Quintessence Int. 1991 Jun;22(6):467-74.
4
A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials.
Am J Dent. 1993 Jun;6(3):137-41.
5
Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.粘结式银汞合金修复体:使用玻璃离子体作为粘结衬层。
Oper Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):411-7.
6
Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.牙本质预处理对光固化离聚物修复材料和聚酸改性复合树脂粘结强度的影响。
J Clin Dent. 1996;7(4):81-4.
7
Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.可流动复合树脂、复合体和玻璃离子水门汀的牙本质粘结强度及微渗漏
Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):325-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00074.x.
8
Resistance to degradation of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements dentine bonds.树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与牙本质粘结的抗降解性。
J Dent. 2009 May;37(5):342-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 1.
9
A comparison of the shear bond strengths to a resin composite of two conventional and two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements.两种传统玻璃聚烯酸酯(离子体)粘固剂和两种树脂改性玻璃聚烯酸酯(离子体)粘固剂与树脂复合材料的剪切粘结强度比较。
J Dent. 1993 Apr;21(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(93)90158-m.
10
Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems.牙根牙本质与三种玻璃纤维桩系统之间的粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jul;96(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.005.