Hem E
Urologisk avdeling Kirurgisk klinikk Ullevål sykehus, Oslo.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Oct 10;116(24):2893-6.
There is no single method for treating all urinary calculi. Because of the non-invasive nature of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy this method has been embraced by patients and doctors alike. However, some 15-20% of the patients require more invasive methods like percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ureteroscopy to get rid of their stones. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is best employed for large stones (> 2.5 cm diameter), staghorn calculi, renal anatomic abnormalities and hard stones and in patients whose anatomy precludes the use of lithotriptor. With the advent of ureteroscopes of much smaller diameter, endourologic intervention has become a steadily safer and more effective means of treating stones in the ureter. With ureteroscopic techniques success rates up to 97% have been reported. A large number of stones have to be fragmented before retrieval. Both ultrasonic and electrohydraulic lithotripsy have been available since the introduction of ureteroscopic techniques. The devices, however, are limited by their size (in the case of ultrasound) and for safety reasons (in the case of electrohydraulic lithotripsy). Laser lithotripsy has received attention as an alternative method of fragmentation which also can be applied with flexible ureteroscopes.
没有一种单一的方法可以治疗所有的尿路结石。由于体外冲击波碎石术具有非侵入性,这种方法受到了患者和医生的一致青睐。然而,约15%至20%的患者需要更具侵入性的方法,如经皮肾镜取石术和输尿管镜检查来排出结石。经皮肾镜取石术最适用于大结石(直径>2.5厘米)、鹿角形结石、肾脏解剖结构异常和坚硬结石,以及解剖结构不适合使用碎石器的患者。随着直径小得多的输尿管镜的出现,腔内泌尿外科干预已成为治疗输尿管结石越来越安全有效的方法。据报道,输尿管镜技术的成功率高达97%。大量结石在取出前必须先破碎。自输尿管镜技术引入以来,超声碎石术和液电碎石术都已可用。然而,这些设备受到其尺寸(超声碎石术的情况)和安全原因(液电碎石术的情况)的限制。激光碎石术作为一种替代破碎方法受到关注,它也可与软性输尿管镜一起应用。