Lingeman J E
Methodist Hospital Institute for Kidney Stone Disease, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Semin Nephrol. 1996 Sep;16(5):487-98.
Advances in surgical techniques have dramatically altered the management of patients with symptomatic urolithiasis requiring intervention. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and ureteroscopy allow virtually any stone to be removed from the upper urinary tract without resorting to open surgical techniques. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the preferred initial treatment for approximately 80% to 85% of calculi. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the preferred approach when dealing with more voluminous stone material (ie, > 2 cm). Ureteroscopy is generally reserved for distal ureteral calculi, although the recent advent of small flexible ureteroscopes have extended ureteroscopic techniques effectively into the proximal ureter and even the kidney. Staghorn stones are usually best managed initially with percutaneous nephrolithotomy followed by the addition of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, if necessary. The relative advantages, disadvantages, and complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and ureteroscopy will be reviewed.
外科技术的进步极大地改变了对有症状的需要干预的尿路结石患者的治疗方式。体外冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和输尿管镜检查几乎可以不采用开放手术技术就从输尿管上段取出任何结石。体外冲击波碎石术是大约80%至85%的结石首选的初始治疗方法。处理体积较大的结石(即直径>2厘米)时,经皮肾镜取石术是首选方法。输尿管镜检查一般用于治疗远端输尿管结石,不过近年来小型软性输尿管镜的出现已有效地将输尿管镜技术扩展至输尿管上段甚至肾脏。鹿角形结石通常最初最好采用经皮肾镜取石术治疗,如有必要,随后可加用体外冲击波碎石术。本文将对体外冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和输尿管镜检查的相对优点、缺点及并发症进行综述。