Newman F L, Tejeda M J
Florida International University, North Miami 33181, USA.
Am Psychol. 1996 Oct;51(10):1040-9. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.51.10.1040.
M.E.P. Seligman (1995) argued that traditional approaches to mental health services research fail to provide useful information to consumers and practitioners, particularly in an environment increasingly dominated by managed care. The authors recommend 4 guidelines for designing a research program so that the results can support the decisions of the major stakeholders (clients-families, practitioners, service managers, and policymakers): (a) Research must be targeted and programmatic and encompass a strategy of complementary efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness studies; (b) study design and measure selection must be sensitive to describe who, and in what context, is best served by which intervention; (c) the design must inform stakeholders as to the type and amount of effort that is required to achieve a behavioral criteria; and (d) the strategy should inform researchers how information should be formatted to best support the decisions of the key stakeholders.
M.E.P. 塞利格曼(1995年)认为,传统的心理健康服务研究方法无法为消费者和从业者提供有用信息,尤其是在一个日益由管理式医疗主导的环境中。作者推荐了4条设计研究项目的指导原则,以便研究结果能够支持主要利益相关者(客户家庭、从业者、服务管理者和政策制定者)的决策:(a)研究必须具有针对性且成体系,并包含一项综合疗效、有效性和成本效益研究的策略;(b)研究设计和测量方法的选择必须能够敏锐地描述哪种干预措施最适合哪些人以及在何种背景下适用;(c)设计必须告知利益相关者达到行为标准所需的努力类型和程度;(d)该策略应告知研究人员信息应以何种形式呈现,以便最好地支持关键利益相关者的决策。