Stroul B A, Pires S A, Armstrong M I, Meyers J C
Management & Training Innovations, Inc., McLean, VA, USA.
Future Child. 1998 Summer-Fall;8(2):119-33.
For more than a decade, the philosophy of community-based systems of care has guided the delivery of mental health services for children and adolescents served by publicly funded agencies. This philosophy supports system attributes that include a broad array of services; interagency collaboration; treatment in the least-restrictive setting; individualized services; family involvement; and services responsive to the needs of diverse ethnic and racial populations. The notion of systems of care emerged in an era when managed health care also was gaining popularity. However, the effect of managed care on the delivery of mental health and substance-abuse services--also known as behavioral health services--has not been widely studied. Preliminary results from the nationwide Health Care Reform Tracking Project (HCRTP) inform discussions about the impact of managed behavioral health care on services for children and adolescents enrolled in state Medicaid programs. Most states have used some type of "carve-out design" to finance the delivery of behavioral health services, and there is a trend toward contracting with private-sector, for-profit companies to administer these benefits. In general, managed care has resulted in greater access to basic behavioral health and community-based services for children and adolescents, though access to inpatient hospital care has been reduced. Under managed care, it also has been more difficult for youths with serious emotional disorders, as well as the uninsured, to obtain needed services. With managed care has come a trend toward briefer, more problem-oriented treatment approaches for behavioral health disorders. A number of problems related to the implementation of managed behavioral health care for children and adolescents were illuminated by the HCRTP. First, there is concern that ongoing efforts to develop systems of care for youths with serious emotional disorders are not being linked with managed care initiatives. The lack of investment in service-capacity development, the lack of coordination with other agencies serving children with behavioral health problems, and cumbersome preauthorization requirements that may restrict access to appropriate service delivery were other concerns raised by respondents about managed care. As the adoption of managed behavioral health care arrangements for Medicaid beneficiaries expands rapidly, the HCRTP will continue to analyze how this trend has affected children and adolescents with behavioral health problems and their families.
十多年来,基于社区的照护体系理念一直指导着由公共资助机构为儿童和青少年提供心理健康服务。这一理念支持的体系属性包括广泛的服务种类、跨机构协作、在限制最少的环境中进行治疗、个性化服务、家庭参与以及针对不同种族和族裔人群需求的服务。照护体系的概念出现在管理式医疗保健也日益流行的时代。然而,管理式医疗保健对心理健康和药物滥用服务(也称为行为健康服务)提供的影响尚未得到广泛研究。全国医疗保健改革跟踪项目(HCRTP)的初步结果为有关管理式行为健康照护对参加州医疗补助计划的儿童和青少年服务影响的讨论提供了信息。大多数州已采用某种类型的“分离设计”来为行为健康服务的提供提供资金,并且存在与私营营利性公司签约以管理这些福利的趋势。总体而言,管理式医疗保健使儿童和青少年能更广泛地获得基本行为健康和基于社区的服务,尽管住院医疗服务的可及性有所降低。在管理式医疗保健模式下,患有严重情绪障碍的青少年以及未参保者获得所需服务也变得更加困难。随着管理式医疗保健的出现,针对行为健康障碍的治疗方法出现了更简短、更以问题为导向的趋势。HCRTP揭示了一些与为儿童和青少年实施管理式行为健康照护相关的问题。首先,有人担心为患有严重情绪障碍的青少年建立照护体系的持续努力未与管理式医疗保健举措相联系。受访者提出的其他担忧包括对服务能力发展缺乏投资、与为有行为健康问题的儿童提供服务的其他机构缺乏协调,以及繁琐的预先授权要求可能会限制获得适当服务的机会。随着为医疗补助受益人采用管理式行为健康照护安排的迅速扩大,HCRTP将继续分析这一趋势如何影响有行为健康问题的儿童、青少年及其家庭。