Bonaiuti D, Fontanella G
Rehabilitation Unit, Bassini Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Dec;77(12):1239-42. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90186-0.
Back School is a rehabilitation treatment for back pain that requires patients to understand an educational message and motivate themselves to modify their behavior to prevent relapses. In examining failed cases, the question arose as to whether the failures could be attributed to affective dimensions of pain that could be reducing tolerance to the pain itself and jeopardizing patients' compliance. We studied the role of the affective component of back pain in Back School failures to see whether this component can be used to predict the treatment's negative results and whether it can be conditioned by the treatment itself.
Inception cohort.
Forty-two subjects with low back pain were treated with Back School at our rehabilitation department.
Evaluation was carried out before Back School treatment and after 2 months, through functional clinical examination and Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (affective and sensory pain indexes).
As outcome of the treatment, we considered the modification of spontaneous and evoked pain and the motility of the spine. Unexpectedly, the nonparametric tests did not show a significant correlation between the affective indicators before and after the treatment. As expected, the two dimensions of pain, affective and sensory, are significantly related to each other, both before and after treatment, but this correlation increases after treatment (from r = .50 to r = 88).
The initial hypothesis was not proven. These results show that high affective scores before Back School do not influence the success of the treatment and that the Back School itself is able to modify both the sensorial and affective pain descriptors.
“返校疗法”是一种针对背痛的康复治疗方法,要求患者理解相关教育信息并激励自己改变行为以预防复发。在研究失败案例时,出现了一个问题,即这些失败是否可归因于疼痛的情感维度,该维度可能会降低对疼痛本身的耐受性并危及患者的依从性。我们研究了背痛情感成分在“返校疗法”失败案例中的作用,以确定该成分是否可用于预测治疗的负面结果以及它是否会受到治疗本身的影响。
起始队列研究。
我们康复科对42名腰痛患者进行了“返校疗法”治疗。
在“返校疗法”治疗前和治疗2个月后,通过功能临床检查和简短麦吉尔疼痛问卷(情感和感觉疼痛指数)进行评估。
作为治疗结果,我们考虑了自发痛和诱发痛的改善以及脊柱的活动度。出乎意料的是,非参数检验未显示治疗前后情感指标之间存在显著相关性。正如预期的那样,疼痛的情感和感觉这两个维度在治疗前后均显著相关,但这种相关性在治疗后有所增加(从r = 0.50增至r = 0.88)。
最初的假设未得到证实。这些结果表明,“返校疗法”前情感得分高并不影响治疗的成功,并且“返校疗法”本身能够改变感觉和情感疼痛描述词。