Suppr超能文献

躯干运动联合脊柱手法治疗或非甾体抗炎药治疗慢性下腰痛:一项随机、观察者盲法的临床试验。

Trunk exercise combined with spinal manipulative or NSAID therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial.

作者信息

Bronfort G, Goldsmith C H, Nelson C F, Boline P D, Anderson A V

机构信息

Northwestern College of Chiropractic, Department of Research, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Nov-Dec;19(9):570-82.

PMID:8976475
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the relative efficacy of three different treatment for chronic low back pain (CLBP). Two preplanned comparisons were made: (a) Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) combined with trunk strengthening exercises (TSE) vs. SMT combined with trunk stretching exercises, and (b) SMT combined with TSE vs. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy combined with TSE.

STUDY DESIGN

Interdisciplinary, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial with a 1-yr follow-up period. The trial evaluated therapies in combination only and was not designed to test the individual treatment components.

SETTING

Primary contact, college out-patient clinic.

PATIENTS

In total, 174 patients aged 20-60 yr were admitted to the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient-rated low back pain, disability, and functional health status at 5 and 11 wk.

INTERVENTIONS

Five weeks of SMT or NSAID therapy in combination with supervised trunk exercise, followed by and additional 6 wk of supervised exercise alone.

RESULTS

Individual group comparisons after 5 and 11 wk of intervention on all three main outcome measures did not reveal any clear clinically important or statistically significant differences. There seemed to be a sustained reduction in medication use at the 1-yr follow-up. in the SMT/TSE group. Continuance of exercise during the follow-up year, regardless of type, was associated with a better outcome.

CONCLUSION

Each of the three therapeutic regimens was associated with similar and clinically important improvement over time that was considered superior to the expected natural history of long-standing CLBP. For the management of CLBP, trunk exercise in combination with SMT or NSAID therapy seemed to be beneficial and worthwhile. The magnitude of nonspecific therapeutic (placebo) effects, cost-effectiveness and relative risks of side effects associated with these types of therapy need to be addressed in future studies.

摘要

目的

研究三种不同治疗方法对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的相对疗效。进行了两项预先计划的比较:(a)脊柱手法治疗(SMT)联合躯干强化训练(TSE)与SMT联合躯干伸展训练,以及(b)SMT联合TSE与非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)治疗联合TSE。

研究设计

跨学科、前瞻性、观察者盲法、随机临床试验,随访期为1年。该试验仅评估联合治疗方法,并非旨在测试各个治疗组成部分。

研究地点

大学门诊初级接触诊所。

患者

共有174名年龄在20至60岁之间的患者纳入研究。

主要观察指标

患者自评的下腰痛、残疾程度以及5周和11周时的功能健康状况。

干预措施

为期5周的SMT或NSAID治疗联合有监督的躯干锻炼,随后单独进行额外6周的有监督锻炼。

结果

在干预5周和11周后,对所有三项主要观察指标进行的个体组间比较未发现任何明显的具有临床重要意义或统计学显著差异。在1年随访时,SMT/TSE组的药物使用似乎持续减少。随访期间无论锻炼类型如何,持续锻炼与更好的结果相关。

结论

随着时间的推移,三种治疗方案中的每一种都与相似且具有临床重要意义的改善相关,这种改善被认为优于长期CLBP的预期自然病程。对于CLBP的管理,躯干锻炼联合SMT或NSAID治疗似乎是有益且值得的。这些类型治疗相关的非特异性治疗(安慰剂)效应的程度、成本效益以及副作用的相对风险需要在未来研究中加以探讨。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验