Suppr超能文献

居家医院模式是否具有经济意义?骨科患者的早期出院与标准护理对比。

Does hospital-at-home make economic sense? Early discharge versus standard care for orthopaedic patients.

作者信息

Hensher M, Fulop N, Hood S, Ujah S

机构信息

London Health Economics Consortium, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, England.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 1996 Oct;89(10):548-51. doi: 10.1177/014107689608901003.

Abstract

Hospital-at-home has been promoted as a potentially effective means of replacing costly inpatient care with cheaper domiciliary care. We studied three hospital-at-home schemes in West London providing intensive home care for early discharge orthopaedic patients, comparing their costs with those of standard inpatient care. Although costs per day of hospital-at-home care were lower than those of inpatient care, the schemes appeared to increase the total duration of orthopaedic episodes, so that the costs of standard care, per episode, were lower than those of hospital-at-home. While hospital-at-home may offer considerable future potential, substitution of home care for inpatient care will not necessarily save resources.

摘要

居家医院护理已被视作一种潜在的有效方式,即用成本更低的居家护理替代昂贵的住院护理。我们研究了伦敦西部的三个居家医院护理计划,这些计划为早期出院的骨科患者提供强化居家护理,并将其成本与标准住院护理的成本进行比较。尽管居家医院护理的每日成本低于住院护理,但这些计划似乎延长了骨科治疗的总时长,因此,每例治疗的标准护理成本低于居家医院护理。虽然居家医院护理未来可能具有巨大潜力,但用居家护理替代住院护理不一定能节省资源。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验