Suppr超能文献

居家医院服务与住院治疗的经济学评估:基于随机对照试验数据的成本最小化分析

Economic evaluation of hospital at home versus hospital care: cost minimisation analysis of data from randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Jones J, Wilson A, Parker H, Wynn A, Jagger C, Spiers N, Parker G

机构信息

Nuffield Community Care Studies Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP.

出版信息

BMJ. 1999 Dec 11;319(7224):1547-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7224.1547.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the costs of admission to a hospital at home scheme with those of acute hospital admission.

DESIGN

Cost minimisation analysis within a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Hospital at home scheme in Leicester and the city's three acute hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

199 consecutive patients assessed as being suitable for admission to hospital at home for acute care during the 18 month trial period (median age 84 years).

INTERVENTION

Hospital at home or hospital inpatient care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs to NHS, social services, patients, and families during the initial episode of treatment and the three months after admission.

RESULTS

Mean (median) costs per episode (including any transfer from hospital at home to hospital) were similar when analysed by intention to treat-hospital at home 2569 pounds sterling (1655 pounds sterling), hospital ward 2881 pounds sterling (2031 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -305 (95% confidence interval -1112 to 448). When analysis was restricted to those who accepted their allocated place of care, hospital at home was significantly cheaper-hospital at home 2557 pounds sterling(1710 pounds sterling), hospital ward 3660 pounds sterling (2903 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -1071 (-1843 to -246). At three months the cost differences were sustained. Costs with all cases included were hospital at home 3671 pounds sterling (2491 pounds sterling), hospital ward 3877 pounds sterling (3405 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -210 (-1025 to 635). When only those accepting allocated care were included the costs were hospital at home 3698 pounds sterling (2493 pounds sterling), hospital ward 4761 pounds sterling (3940 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -1063 (-2044 to -163); P=0.009. About 25% of the costs for episodes of hospital at home were incurred through transfer to hospital. Costs per day of care were higher in the hospital at home arm (mean 207 pounds sterling v 134 pounds sterling in the hospital arm, excluding refusers, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital at home can deliver care at similar or lower cost than an equivalent admission to an acute hospital.

摘要

目的

比较居家医院护理计划的住院费用与急性医院住院费用。

设计

在一项实用随机对照试验中进行成本最小化分析。

地点

莱斯特的居家医院护理计划以及该市的三家急性医院。

参与者

在18个月的试验期内,连续199例被评估适合居家接受急性护理的患者(中位年龄84岁)。

干预措施

居家医院护理或住院护理。

主要观察指标

国民健康服务体系、社会服务部门、患者及其家庭在初始治疗阶段以及入院后三个月的费用。

结果

按意向性分析,每例发作的平均(中位)费用(包括从居家医院转至医院的任何费用)相似——居家医院护理为2569英镑(1655英镑),医院病房护理为2881英镑(2031英镑),自抽样法得出的平均差值为-305(95%置信区间为-1112至448)。当分析仅限于接受分配护理地点的患者时,居家医院护理明显更便宜——居家医院护理为2557英镑(1710英镑),医院病房护理为3660英镑(2903英镑),自抽样法得出的平均差值为-1071(-1843至-246)。在三个月时,成本差异仍然存在。纳入所有病例的费用为:居家医院护理3671英镑(2491英镑),医院病房护理3877英镑(3405英镑),自抽样法得出的平均差值为-210(-1025至635)。当仅纳入接受分配护理的患者时,费用为:居家医院护理3698英镑(2493英镑),医院病房护理4761英镑(3940英镑),自抽样法得出的平均差值为-1063(-2044至-163);P = 0.009。居家医院护理发作的费用约25%是通过转至医院产生的。居家医院护理组的每日护理费用更高(平均207英镑,而医院护理组为134英镑,不包括拒绝者,P<0.001)。

结论

居家医院护理能够以与急性医院同等住院护理相似或更低的成本提供护理。

相似文献

4
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: a cost effectiveness analysis.
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 10;119(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.218. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
6
Hospital at home or acute hospital care? A cost minimisation analysis.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1802-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1802.
7

引用本文的文献

1
Preference of primary care patients for home-based healthcare and support services: a discrete choice experiment in China.
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1324776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776. eCollection 2024.
3
Admission avoidance hospital at home.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 5;3(3):CD007491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007491.pub3.
4
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) for the management of bronchiectasis.
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19968. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19968. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
The Cost-Effectiveness of Homecare Services for Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3373. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043373.
6
Hospital-at-Home: Multistakeholder Considerations for Program Dissemination and Scale.
Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):673-701. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12586. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
8
A benefit-cost analysis of different response scenarios to COVID-19: A case study.
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 4;4(2):e286. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.286. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Developing and validating a checklist for accreditation in leadership and management of hospitals in Iran.
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Oct 29;7:136. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_54_18. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptual and practical difficulties with the economic evaluation of health services developments.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):42-8. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500110.
3
The hospital of the future. Better out than in? Alternatives to acute hospital care.
BMJ. 1999 Oct 23;319(7217):1127-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7217.1127.
5
Hospital at home. Costings were inadequate.
BMJ. 1998 Dec 12;317(7173):1651-2.
6
Managing demand for secondary care services: the changing context.
BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):135-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.135.
7
Hospital at home or acute hospital care? A cost minimisation analysis.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1802-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1802.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验