Jones J, Wilson A, Parker H, Wynn A, Jagger C, Spiers N, Parker G
Nuffield Community Care Studies Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP.
BMJ. 1999 Dec 11;319(7224):1547-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7224.1547.
To compare the costs of admission to a hospital at home scheme with those of acute hospital admission.
Cost minimisation analysis within a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Hospital at home scheme in Leicester and the city's three acute hospitals.
199 consecutive patients assessed as being suitable for admission to hospital at home for acute care during the 18 month trial period (median age 84 years).
Hospital at home or hospital inpatient care.
Costs to NHS, social services, patients, and families during the initial episode of treatment and the three months after admission.
Mean (median) costs per episode (including any transfer from hospital at home to hospital) were similar when analysed by intention to treat-hospital at home 2569 pounds sterling (1655 pounds sterling), hospital ward 2881 pounds sterling (2031 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -305 (95% confidence interval -1112 to 448). When analysis was restricted to those who accepted their allocated place of care, hospital at home was significantly cheaper-hospital at home 2557 pounds sterling(1710 pounds sterling), hospital ward 3660 pounds sterling (2903 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -1071 (-1843 to -246). At three months the cost differences were sustained. Costs with all cases included were hospital at home 3671 pounds sterling (2491 pounds sterling), hospital ward 3877 pounds sterling (3405 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -210 (-1025 to 635). When only those accepting allocated care were included the costs were hospital at home 3698 pounds sterling (2493 pounds sterling), hospital ward 4761 pounds sterling (3940 pounds sterling), bootstrap mean difference -1063 (-2044 to -163); P=0.009. About 25% of the costs for episodes of hospital at home were incurred through transfer to hospital. Costs per day of care were higher in the hospital at home arm (mean 207 pounds sterling v 134 pounds sterling in the hospital arm, excluding refusers, P<0.001).
Hospital at home can deliver care at similar or lower cost than an equivalent admission to an acute hospital.
比较居家医院护理计划的住院费用与急性医院住院费用。
在一项实用随机对照试验中进行成本最小化分析。
莱斯特的居家医院护理计划以及该市的三家急性医院。
在18个月的试验期内,连续199例被评估适合居家接受急性护理的患者(中位年龄84岁)。
居家医院护理或住院护理。
国民健康服务体系、社会服务部门、患者及其家庭在初始治疗阶段以及入院后三个月的费用。
按意向性分析,每例发作的平均(中位)费用(包括从居家医院转至医院的任何费用)相似——居家医院护理为2569英镑(1655英镑),医院病房护理为2881英镑(2031英镑),自抽样法得出的平均差值为-305(95%置信区间为-1112至448)。当分析仅限于接受分配护理地点的患者时,居家医院护理明显更便宜——居家医院护理为2557英镑(1710英镑),医院病房护理为3660英镑(2903英镑),自抽样法得出的平均差值为-1071(-1843至-246)。在三个月时,成本差异仍然存在。纳入所有病例的费用为:居家医院护理3671英镑(2491英镑),医院病房护理3877英镑(3405英镑),自抽样法得出的平均差值为-210(-1025至635)。当仅纳入接受分配护理的患者时,费用为:居家医院护理3698英镑(2493英镑),医院病房护理4761英镑(3940英镑),自抽样法得出的平均差值为-1063(-2044至-163);P = 0.009。居家医院护理发作的费用约25%是通过转至医院产生的。居家医院护理组的每日护理费用更高(平均207英镑,而医院护理组为134英镑,不包括拒绝者,P<0.001)。
居家医院护理能够以与急性医院同等住院护理相似或更低的成本提供护理。