Suppr超能文献

前列腺可视化激光消融术:通过尿动力学评估疗效并与经尿道前列腺切除术进行比较。

Visual laser ablation of the prostate: efficacy evaluated by urodynamics and compared to TURP.

作者信息

Jung P, Mattelaer P, Wolff J M, Mersdorf A, Jakse G

机构信息

Urologic Clinic, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 1996;30(4):418-23. doi: 10.1159/000474209.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP) in comparison to conventional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

133 patients with benign hyperplasia of the prostate (BPH) were treated by VLAP (n = 90) or TURP (n = 43). International prostate symptom score (IPSS), uroflow, residual urine and grade of obstruction determined by pressure flow studies were evaluated before and after treatment. The VLAP was performed by means of a side firing laser fiber under visual control and using a Nd:YAG laser as energy source.

RESULTS

VLAP could improve IPSS, uroflow and residual urine in all patients. However, the obstruction grade was lowered to normal only in patients with prostates smaller than 50 ml, whereas TURP was able to eliminate the obstruction in all patients.

CONCLUSION

VLAP can be offered as an alternative to TURP in patients with BPH as long as the prostate volume is not bigger than 50 ml.

摘要

目的

确定可视激光前列腺切除术(VLAP)与传统经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)相比的疗效。

材料与方法

133例前列腺良性增生(BPH)患者接受了VLAP治疗(n = 90)或TURP治疗(n = 43)。在治疗前后评估国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、尿流率、残余尿量以及通过压力流研究确定的梗阻等级。VLAP通过在可视控制下使用侧面发射激光光纤并以钕钇铝石榴石激光作为能量源来进行。

结果

VLAP可改善所有患者的IPSS、尿流率和残余尿量。然而,仅前列腺体积小于50毫升的患者梗阻等级降至正常,而TURP能够消除所有患者的梗阻。

结论

对于BPH患者,只要前列腺体积不大于50毫升,VLAP可作为TURP的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验