• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation.

作者信息

Rosenfield M, Cohen A S

机构信息

State University of New York, State College of Optometry, NY 10010, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 May;16(3):247-9.

PMID:8977892
Abstract

In order to determine whether a significant change has occurred in a clinical parameter, it is essential to assess the repeatability of the measurement procedure. Accordingly, the present study has examined the repeatability of three techniques for evaluating the subjective amplitude of accommodation. Clinical amplitudes were determined using the push-up, push-down and minus lens procedures in 13 young individuals (mean age: 24.3 years) on five separate occasions. The standard deviation (SD) of the five examinations was calculated for each individual and the mean values for the population sample determined. The mean SDs for the push-up, push-down and minus lens techniques were equivalent, with 95% confidence limits of approximately 1.4 D being observed for all three procedures. Furthermore, the mean amplitude recorded using the push-up technique was significantly higher than that observed for the other two procedures. It is concluded that a change of at least +/- 1.50 D should be adopted as the minimum significant shift in amplitude of accommodation for this group.

摘要

相似文献

1
Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 May;16(3):247-9.
2
A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation.动态检影验光与主观测量调节幅度的可靠性比较。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Mar;32(2):133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00891.x. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
3
Repeatability intraexaminer and agreement in amplitude of accommodation measurements.检查者内重复性及调节测量幅度的一致性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;247(1):121-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0938-9. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
4
Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio.隐斜视测量技术对临床调节性集合与调节比率的影响。
Optometry. 2006 May;77(5):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2006.02.006.
5
Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.主观验光与客观验光的可重复性。
Optom Vis Sci. 1995 Aug;72(8):577-9.
6
Comparison of subjective heterophoria testing with a phoropter and trial frame.使用综合验光仪和试验框架进行主观隐斜视检测的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Apr;83(4):237-41. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000214316.50270.24.
7
Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer.使用精工(Grand Seiko)和哈廷格(Hartinger)重合验光仪进行客观调节测量。
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Sep;84(9):879-87. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181559ace.
8
Intra-examiner repeatability and agreement in accommodative response measurements.调节反应测量的观察者内重复性和一致性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Nov;29(6):606-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00679.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
9
Effect of target distance on accommodative amplitude measured using the minus lens technique.使用负透镜技术测量目标距离对调节幅度的影响。
Clin Exp Optom. 2014 Jan;97(1):62-5. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12090. Epub 2013 Jul 28.
10
Comparing measurement techniques of accommodative amplitudes.比较调节幅度的测量技术。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;62(6):683-7. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.126990.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and Agreement of an Integrated Platform for Intelligent Visual Function Measurement.智能视觉功能测量集成平台的可靠性与一致性
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Aug;12(4):1929-1937. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00718-9. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Comparison of the Amplitude of Accommodation Measured Using a New-Generation Closed-Field Autorefractor with Conventional Subjective Methods.使用新一代封闭式自动验光仪测量的调节幅度与传统主观方法的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;12(3):568. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030568.
3
The effect of peripheral defocus on axial growth and modulation of refractive error in hyperopes.
周边远视离焦对远视眼轴向生长和屈光不正调节的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 May;42(3):534-544. doi: 10.1111/opo.12951. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
4
Accommodative and binocular vision dysfunctions in a Portuguese clinical population.葡萄牙临床人群的调节和双眼视功能障碍。
J Optom. 2022 Oct-Dec;15(4):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
5
Improvement of Presbyopia Using a Mixture of Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicines, Including Cassiae Semen, Wolfberry, and .使用包括决明子、枸杞等在内的中药混合物改善老花眼
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Jul 27;2021:9902211. doi: 10.1155/2021/9902211. eCollection 2021.
6
Changes in accommodative function following small-incision lenticule extraction for high myopia.高度近视小切口微透镜取出术后调节功能的变化。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244602. eCollection 2020.
7
Diurnal variations of amplitude of accommodation in different age groups.不同年龄组调节幅度的昼夜变化。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 26;14(11):e0225754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225754. eCollection 2019.
8
A Review of Depth of Focus in Measurement of the Amplitude of Accommodation.调节幅度测量中焦深的综述。
Vision (Basel). 2018 Sep 6;2(3):37. doi: 10.3390/vision2030037.
9
Validation of Novel Metrics from the Accommodative Dynamic Profile.调节动态轮廓新指标的验证
Vision (Basel). 2018 Aug 21;2(3):34. doi: 10.3390/vision2030034.
10
Comparison of Dynamic Retinoscopy and Autorefraction for Measurement of Accommodative Amplitude.动态视网膜检影法与自动验光仪测量调节幅度的比较
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Sep;96(9):670-677. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001423.