• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢他啶与亚胺培南作为中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热性发作初始单一疗法的随机对照研究。

Randomised comparison of ceftazidime and imipenem as initial monotherapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients.

作者信息

Aparicio J, Oltra A, Llorca C, Montalar J, Herranz C, Gómez-Codina J, Pastor M, Munárriz B

机构信息

Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 1996 Sep;32A(10):1739-43. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00188-8.

DOI:10.1016/0959-8049(96)00188-8
PMID:8983283
Abstract

With the availability of new, broad-spectrum antibiotics, initial therapy with a single agent has become an alternative to classic combinations in the management of febrile, neutropenic cancer patients. The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime and imipenem as empirical monotherapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients, and to examine the frequency with which second-line antibiotics (amikacin, vancomycin, or both) were required. A prospective clinical trial was carried out in a single centre. Eligible patients with solid tumours or lymphoma were randomised to receive monotherapy with ceftazidime or imipenem. In the event of no response, amikacin and/or vancomycin were added in 48-72 h intervals (sequentially, or according to clinical or microbiological data). Efficacy was evaluable for 111 assessable episodes. Median neutrophil count at entry was 100 cells/microliters and median duration of neutropenia was 4 days. Febrile episodes were classified as microbiologically (34%) or clinically documented (42%), and fever of unknown origin (24%). Gram-negative infections (57%) predominated over gram-positive isolates (30%). The overall success rate with monotherapy (69% versus 70%), or with modification (20% versus 23%) were equivalent for ceftazidime and imipenem (P = 0.75). The mortality in this series was 5%. Single-agent therapy with either ceftazidime or imipenem is effective for the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with solid tumours. Early addition of amikacin and/or vancomycin resolves most failures of the first step.

摘要

随着新型广谱抗生素的出现,在发热性中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者管理中,单药初始治疗已成为经典联合治疗的替代方案。本研究的目的是比较头孢他啶和亚胺培南作为中性粒细胞减少患者发热发作经验性单药治疗的疗效,并检查需要二线抗生素(阿米卡星、万古霉素或两者)的频率。在单一中心进行了一项前瞻性临床试验。符合条件的实体瘤或淋巴瘤患者被随机分配接受头孢他啶或亚胺培南单药治疗。如果无反应,则每隔48 - 72小时添加阿米卡星和/或万古霉素(依次添加,或根据临床或微生物学数据添加)。对111次可评估发作的疗效进行了评估。入组时中性粒细胞计数中位数为100个细胞/微升,中性粒细胞减少的中位数持续时间为4天。发热发作分为微生物学确诊(34%)或临床确诊(42%),以及不明原因发热(24%)。革兰阴性菌感染(57%)多于革兰阳性菌分离株(30%)。头孢他啶和亚胺培南单药治疗的总体成功率(分别为69%和70%)或联合用药后的成功率(分别为20%和23%)相当(P = 0.75)。该系列的死亡率为5%。头孢他啶或亚胺培南单药治疗对实体瘤中性粒细胞减少患者发热发作的经验性治疗有效。早期添加阿米卡星和/或万古霉素可解决大多数第一步治疗失败的情况。

相似文献

1
Randomised comparison of ceftazidime and imipenem as initial monotherapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients.头孢他啶与亚胺培南作为中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热性发作初始单一疗法的随机对照研究。
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Sep;32A(10):1739-43. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00188-8.
2
[Imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftazidime-amikacin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients].亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢他啶-阿米卡星治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的对比研究
Rev Med Chil. 1995 Mar;123(3):312-20.
3
Randomized comparison of cefepime versus ceftazidime monotherapy for fever and neutropenia in children with solid tumors.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶单药治疗实体瘤患儿发热伴中性粒细胞减少症的随机对照研究
Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001 Apr;36(4):434-41. doi: 10.1002/mpo.1107.
4
A comparison of imipenem to ceftazidime with or without amikacin as empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients.在发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中,将亚胺培南与头孢他啶联用或不联用阿米卡星作为经验性治疗的比较。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Feb;152(2):283-91.
5
Cefepime monotherapy as an empirical initial treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia.头孢吡肟单药治疗作为发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的经验性初始治疗。
Med Oncol. 2002;19(3):161-6. doi: 10.1385/MO:19:3:161.
6
Meropenem monotherapy versus combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶联合阿米卡星治疗对发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的经验性治疗
Ann Hematol. 1998 Feb;76(2):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s002770050366.
7
Cefepime versus ceftazidime as empiric monotherapy for fever and neutropenia in children with cancer.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶作为癌症患儿发热伴中性粒细胞减少症经验性单药治疗的比较
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Mar;21(3):203-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200203000-00009.
8
Monotherapy for fever and neutropenia in cancer patients: a randomized comparison of ceftazidime versus imipenem.癌症患者发热伴中性粒细胞减少的单药治疗:头孢他啶与亚胺培南的随机对照比较
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):165-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.165.
9
Ceftazidime versus imipenem-cilastatin as initial monotherapy for febrile neutropenic patients.头孢他啶与亚胺培南-西司他丁作为发热性中性粒细胞减少患者初始单一疗法的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jul;34(7):1336-41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.7.1336.
10
Imipenem compared with ceftazidime plus vancomycin as initial therapy for fever in neutropenic children with cancer.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991 Dec;10(12):918-23. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199112000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Infections in Hospitalized Patients, Treatment Outcomes.住院患者的感染、治疗结果。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 May 25;10(6):630. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060630.
2
The cost-effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatments for high-risk febrile neutropenic patients: A decision analytic model.高危发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性抗生素治疗的成本效益:一项决策分析模型。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20022. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020022.
3
Effect of Combination Therapy of Ceftazidime/Amikacin and Monotherapy with Imipenem on the Treatment of Fever and Neutropenia in Patients with Cancers.
头孢他啶/阿米卡星联合治疗与亚胺培南单药治疗对癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 18;6(8):1423-1430. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.310. eCollection 2018 Aug 20.
4
Evaluation of febrile neutropenic attacks of pediatric hematology-oncology patients.小儿血液肿瘤患者发热性中性粒细胞减少发作的评估。
Turk Pediatri Ars. 2017 Dec 1;52(4):213-220. doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2017.5312. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
Comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime and meropenem in treatment of febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients with cancer.比较头孢他啶和美罗培南治疗儿童癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效。
Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol. 2013;3(3):103-7. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams.用于发热性中性粒细胞减少症初始经验性治疗的抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类药物:β-内酰胺类药物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD005197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005197.pub3.
7
Cefepime monotherapy as an empirical initial treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia.头孢吡肟单药治疗作为发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的经验性初始治疗。
Med Oncol. 2002;19(3):161-6. doi: 10.1385/MO:19:3:161.
8
Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime or imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftriaxone + aminoglycoside in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients in Germany.德国头孢他啶或亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢曲松+氨基糖苷类药物治疗中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热性发作的成本效益
Infection. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02565166.