Suppr超能文献

头孢他啶与亚胺培南-西司他丁作为发热性中性粒细胞减少患者初始单一疗法的比较

Ceftazidime versus imipenem-cilastatin as initial monotherapy for febrile neutropenic patients.

作者信息

Liang R, Yung R, Chiu E, Chau P Y, Chan T K, Lam W K, Todd D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jul;34(7):1336-41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.7.1336.

Abstract

One hundred febrile episodes in 89 neutropenic patients after cytotoxic chemotherapy were randomized to be treated with either ceftazidime or imipenem as initial monotherapy. The clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients were comparable. The response of the fever in patients who received imipenem was significantly better than that in those who received ceftazidime (77 versus 56%, respectively; P = 0.04), especially in those with microbiologically documented infection (81 versus 33%, respectively; P = 0.02). The in vitro susceptibilities and the clinical responses suggested that, with the possible exception of Pseudomonas spp., imipenem was more effective than ceftazidime in treating neutropenic infections caused by both gram-positive and -negative organisms. An additional 23 and 21% of the patients in the ceftazidime and imipenem groups, respectively, responded to the addition of cloxacillin and amikacin following failure of monotherapy. The majority of the treatment failures, relapses, and superinfections were related to resistant infective organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. or disseminated fungal infections.

摘要

89例接受细胞毒性化疗后的中性粒细胞减少患者出现的100次发热发作被随机分为两组,分别接受头孢他啶或亚胺培南作为初始单一疗法进行治疗。两组患者的临床特征具有可比性。接受亚胺培南治疗的患者发热反应明显优于接受头孢他啶治疗的患者(分别为77%和56%;P = 0.04),尤其是在有微生物学证实感染的患者中(分别为81%和33%;P = 0.02)。体外药敏试验和临床反应表明,除假单胞菌属外,亚胺培南在治疗由革兰氏阳性和阴性菌引起的中性粒细胞减少感染方面比头孢他啶更有效。在单一疗法失败后,头孢他啶组和亚胺培南组分别有23%和21%的患者在加用氯唑西林和阿米卡星后有反应。大多数治疗失败、复发和二重感染与耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌属和假单胞菌属等耐药感染菌或播散性真菌感染有关。

相似文献

1
Ceftazidime versus imipenem-cilastatin as initial monotherapy for febrile neutropenic patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jul;34(7):1336-41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.7.1336.
4
Imipenem-cilastatin versus piperacillin-tazobactam as monotherapy in febrile neutropenia.
Pediatr Int. 2010 Apr;52(2):262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02952.x. Epub 2009 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

2
Effect of Combination Therapy of Ceftazidime/Amikacin and Monotherapy with Imipenem on the Treatment of Fever and Neutropenia in Patients with Cancers.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 18;6(8):1423-1430. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.310. eCollection 2018 Aug 20.
4
Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD005197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005197.pub3.
9
Infections in neutropenic patients. II: Management.
Med Oncol. 1996 Mar;13(1):63-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02988841.

本文引用的文献

1
Empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 May;13(5):409-11. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.5.409.
3
Approaching the controversies in antibacterial management of cancer patients.
Am J Med. 1984 Mar;76(3):436-49. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90663-6.
5
Amphotericin B or ketoconazole therapy of fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Jan;31(1):11-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.1.11.
8
Imipenem-cilastatin as initial therapy for febrile cancer patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Aug;30(2):211-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.30.2.211.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验