Liang R, Yung R, Chiu E, Chau P Y, Chan T K, Lam W K, Todd D
Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jul;34(7):1336-41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.7.1336.
One hundred febrile episodes in 89 neutropenic patients after cytotoxic chemotherapy were randomized to be treated with either ceftazidime or imipenem as initial monotherapy. The clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients were comparable. The response of the fever in patients who received imipenem was significantly better than that in those who received ceftazidime (77 versus 56%, respectively; P = 0.04), especially in those with microbiologically documented infection (81 versus 33%, respectively; P = 0.02). The in vitro susceptibilities and the clinical responses suggested that, with the possible exception of Pseudomonas spp., imipenem was more effective than ceftazidime in treating neutropenic infections caused by both gram-positive and -negative organisms. An additional 23 and 21% of the patients in the ceftazidime and imipenem groups, respectively, responded to the addition of cloxacillin and amikacin following failure of monotherapy. The majority of the treatment failures, relapses, and superinfections were related to resistant infective organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. or disseminated fungal infections.
89例接受细胞毒性化疗后的中性粒细胞减少患者出现的100次发热发作被随机分为两组,分别接受头孢他啶或亚胺培南作为初始单一疗法进行治疗。两组患者的临床特征具有可比性。接受亚胺培南治疗的患者发热反应明显优于接受头孢他啶治疗的患者(分别为77%和56%;P = 0.04),尤其是在有微生物学证实感染的患者中(分别为81%和33%;P = 0.02)。体外药敏试验和临床反应表明,除假单胞菌属外,亚胺培南在治疗由革兰氏阳性和阴性菌引起的中性粒细胞减少感染方面比头孢他啶更有效。在单一疗法失败后,头孢他啶组和亚胺培南组分别有23%和21%的患者在加用氯唑西林和阿米卡星后有反应。大多数治疗失败、复发和二重感染与耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌属和假单胞菌属等耐药感染菌或播散性真菌感染有关。