• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Esophagomyotomy versus forceful dilation for achalasia of the esophagus: results in 899 patients.

作者信息

Okike N, Payne W S, Neufeld D M, Bernatz P E, Pairolero P C, Sanderson D R

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1979 Aug;28(2):119-25. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63767-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63767-8
PMID:89837
Abstract

Between 1949 and 1976, 899 patients underwent treatment for achalasia of the esophagus at the Mayo Clinic, 431 by forceful hydrostatic or pneumatic dilation and 468 by a standardized transthoracic esophagomyotomy. Esophageal leak and mediastinal sepsis was an uncommon but major complication of both types of therapy, occurring four times more often with dilation (4%) than with myotomy (1%), although no deaths resulted from this in either group. The 30-day mortality was 0.2% after myotomy and 0.5% after forceful dilation. Although there was minimal morbidity and mortality with either modality, the late results were significantly superior after myotomy. Excellent to good results were obtained by 85% of the group treated with myotomy but only by 65% of those treated with hydrostatic dilation. Late poor results were encountered three times more frequently after dilation (19%) than after myotomy (6%). Analysis of poor results after myotomy indicates that late serious complications of gastroesophageal reflux developed in only 3% of patients operated on.

摘要

相似文献

1
Esophagomyotomy versus forceful dilation for achalasia of the esophagus: results in 899 patients.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1979 Aug;28(2):119-25. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63767-8.
2
A prospective assessment of gastroesophageal reflux before and after treatment of achalasia patients: pneumatic dilation versus transthoracic limited myotomy.贲门失弛缓症患者治疗前后胃食管反流的前瞻性评估:气囊扩张术与经胸局限性肌切开术对比
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jul;92(7):1109-12.
3
Achalasia of the esophagus. A reappraisal of esophagomyotomy vs forceful pneumatic dilation.食管贲门失弛缓症。食管肌层切开术与强力气囊扩张术的再评估。
Am J Dig Dis. 1975 Sep;20(9):841-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01070952.
4
Transthoracic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia: analysis of long-term results.经胸Heller肌切开术治疗食管贲门失弛缓症:长期结果分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jun;81(6):2044-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.039.
5
Results of myotomy and partial fundoplication after pneumatic dilation for achalasia.贲门失弛缓症气囊扩张术后肌切开术和部分胃底折叠术的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Aug;62(2):327-30.
6
S093: pneumatic balloon dilation for palliation of recurrent symptoms of achalasia after esophagomyotomy.S093:经肌切开术后治疗贲门失弛缓症复发症状的气囊扩张。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):4017-4021. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6271-4. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
7
Clinical factors and high-resolution manometry predicting response to surgery for achalasia in children.预测儿童贲门失弛缓症手术反应的临床因素及高分辨率测压法
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 May 11.
8
Videoscopic heller myotomy as first-line therapy for severe achalasia.电视辅助下贲门肌层切开术作为重症贲门失弛缓症的一线治疗方法。
Am Surg. 2001 Nov;67(11):1105-9.
9
Comparison of forceful dilatation and esophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia of the esophagus.
Hepatogastroenterology. 1991 Dec;38(6):502-5.
10
Operation for esophageal achalasia. Results of esophagomyotomy without an antireflux operation.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984 Sep;88(3):344-51.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolution of the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: From the Open to the Minimally Invasive Approach.食管失弛缓症治疗的演变:从开放手术到微创方法。
World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1522-1526. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06482-4. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
30-day morbidity and mortality of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one anastomosis gastric bypass: a propensity score-matched analysis of the GENEVA data.袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和单吻合口胃旁路术 30 天发病率和死亡率:GENEVA 数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2022 Apr;46(4):750-757. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-01048-1. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Prognostic factors of esophageal perforation and rupture leading to mortality: a retrospective study.
食管穿孔和破裂导致死亡的预后因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Oct 9;16(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01680-y.
4
Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Publications in Achalasia Research from 1995 to 2020.食管失弛缓症研究中最具影响力出版物的范围回顾和文献计量分析 1995 年至 2020 年。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Feb 4;2021:8836395. doi: 10.1155/2021/8836395. eCollection 2021.
5
Vigorous achalasia: Zebra amongst horses.重症贲门失弛缓症:万马丛中一“斑马”。
SA J Radiol. 2020 Nov 30;24(1):1953. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v24i1.1953. eCollection 2020.
6
The 100 most cited manuscripts in esophageal motility disorders: a bibliometric analysis.食管动力障碍领域被引用次数最多的100篇手稿:一项文献计量分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(14):310. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.34.
7
Update on the endoscopic treatments for achalasia.贲门失弛缓症内镜治疗的最新进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct 21;22(39):8670-8683. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8670.
8
Clinical decision where evidence is lacking.
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;11(7):901-2. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1380-8. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
9
Surgical treatment of achalasia in children: is an added antireflux procedure necessary?
Pediatr Surg Int. 1996 Mar;11(2-3):134-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00183745. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
10
Revisional surgery after heller myotomy for treatment of achalasia: a comparative analysis focusing on operative approach.贲门失弛缓症行赫勒肌切开术后的翻修手术:聚焦手术入路的比较分析
Indian J Surg. 2012 Aug;74(4):309-13. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0402-7. Epub 2012 Jan 21.