Suppr超能文献

内镜下静脉曲张套扎术治疗食管静脉曲张优于套扎术联合硬化剂注射治疗:一项多中心前瞻性随机试验。

Endoscopic variceal ligation is superior to combined ligation and sclerotherapy for esophageal varices: a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Saeed Z A, Stiegmann G V, Ramirez F C, Reveille R M, Goff J S, Hepps K S, Cole R A

机构信息

Veterans Affair Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Hepatology. 1997 Jan;25(1):71-4. doi: 10.1002/hep.510250113.

Abstract

Patients who have bled from varices remain at risk for rebleeding. There is interest in methods that would enable rapid eradication of varices. The present trial was designed to study whether combining ligation with sclerotherapy will allow quicker eradication of varices than either modality alone. Patients with bleeding esophageal varices were randomized into ligation or combination therapy groups. Patients in the ligation group were treated with endoscopic rubber band ligation alone. In combination group patients, each variceal column was ligated distally and 1 mL of ethanolamine was injected proximal to each ligated site. Subsequent treatment sessions were at 7- to 14-day intervals until varices were eradicated. The clinical and endoscopic characteristics of 25 patients in the ligation group were similar to those of 22 patients in the combination group. Follow-up was up to 30 months. Active bleeding was controlled in 100% of patients in the ligation group and 75% of those in combination group (P = NS). It took 3.3 +/- .4 (range, 1-7) sessions to eradicate varices with ligation and 4.1 +/- .6 (1-7) with combination therapy (P = NS). Survival (four deaths in ligation group, 8 in combination group), rebleeding rate (25% vs. 36%), and varix recurrence (16% vs. 23%) also were similar. There were more complications with combination therapy, including deep ulcers (65% vs. 20%; P < .05); dysphagia (30% vs. 0%; P < .05), with three strictures requiring dilation; and pain (30% vs. 10%; P = NS). Our results show that sclerotherapy combined with ligation offers no benefit over ligation alone. The higher complication rate with combination therapy does not warrant this approach.

摘要

曾因静脉曲张出血的患者仍有再次出血的风险。人们对能够快速消除静脉曲张的方法很感兴趣。本试验旨在研究结扎术与硬化疗法联合使用是否比单独使用任何一种方法能更快地消除静脉曲张。患有食管静脉曲张出血的患者被随机分为结扎组或联合治疗组。结扎组患者仅接受内镜下橡皮圈套扎治疗。联合治疗组患者,每个静脉曲张柱在远端进行结扎,并在每个结扎部位近端注射1毫升乙醇胺。后续治疗疗程间隔7至14天,直至静脉曲张消除。结扎组25例患者与联合治疗组22例患者的临床和内镜特征相似。随访时间长达30个月。结扎组100%的患者和联合治疗组75%的患者的活动性出血得到控制(P=无显著性差异)。结扎术消除静脉曲张需要3.3±0.4次(范围1 - 7次)治疗,联合治疗需要4.1±0.6次(1 - 7次)治疗(P=无显著性差异)。生存率(结扎组4例死亡,联合治疗组8例死亡)、再出血率(25%对36%)和静脉曲张复发率(16%对23%)也相似。联合治疗的并发症更多,包括深度溃疡(65%对20%;P<0.05);吞咽困难(30%对0%;P<0.05),有3例狭窄需要扩张;以及疼痛(30%对10%;P=无显著性差异)。我们的结果表明,硬化疗法联合结扎术并不比单独结扎术更具优势。联合治疗较高的并发症发生率并不支持这种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验