• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输精管切除术后的生育选择:一项成本效益分析。

Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Pavlovich C P, Schlegel P N

机构信息

James Buchanan Brady Foundation. Department of Urology, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1997 Jan;67(1):133-41. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81870-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81870-5
PMID:8986698
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cost per delivery using two different initial approaches to the treatment of postvasectomy infertility.

DESIGN

Model of expected costs and results in the United States in 1994.

SETTING

Men with postvasectomy infertility, evaluated and treated at centers with experience in vasectomy reversal or sperm retrieval and ICSI.

PATIENT(S): Men with postvasectomy infertility, with a female partner < or = 39 years of age.

INTERVENTION(S): Initial microsurgical vasectomy reversal was compared with retrieved epididymal or testicular sperm. Actual treatment charges, complication rates, and pregnancy and delivery rates obtained in the United States were used for cost per delivery analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cost per delivery, delivery rates.

RESULT(S): Cost per delivery with an initial approach of vasectomy reversal was only $25,475. (95% confidence interval $19,609 to $31,339), with a delivery rate of 47%. However, the cost per delivery after sperm retrieval and ICSI was $72,521. (95% confidence interval $63,357 to $81,685), with an average of $73,146 for percutaneous or testicular sperm retrieval and $71,896 for surgical epididymal sperm retrieval. The delivery rate after one cycle of sperm retrieval and ICSI was 33%.

CONCLUSION(S): The most cost-effective approach to treatment of postvasectomy infertility is microsurgical vasectomy reversal. This treatment also has the highest chance of resulting in delivery of a child for a single intervention.

摘要

目的

采用两种不同的初始方法治疗输精管切除术后不育症,评估每次分娩的成本。

设计

1994年美国预期成本和结果模型。

地点

在输精管复通或精子采集及卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)方面有经验的中心对输精管切除术后不育的男性进行评估和治疗。

患者

输精管切除术后不育的男性,其女性伴侣年龄≤39岁。

干预措施

将初始显微外科输精管复通术与附睾或睾丸精子采集进行比较。使用在美国获得的实际治疗费用、并发症发生率以及妊娠和分娩率进行每次分娩成本分析。

主要观察指标

每次分娩成本、分娩率。

结果

初始采用输精管复通术方法时,每次分娩成本仅为25475美元(95%置信区间为19609美元至31339美元),分娩率为47%。然而,精子采集及ICSI后的每次分娩成本为72521美元(95%置信区间为63357美元至81685美元),经皮或睾丸精子采集平均为73146美元,手术附睾精子采集平均为71896美元。精子采集及ICSI一个周期后的分娩率为33%。

结论

治疗输精管切除术后不育症最具成本效益的方法是显微外科输精管复通术。这种治疗方法在单次干预中也有最高的生育机会。

相似文献

1
Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.输精管切除术后的生育选择:一项成本效益分析。
Fertil Steril. 1997 Jan;67(1):133-41. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81870-5.
2
Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.输精管附睾吻合术用于输精管复通:在卵胞浆内单精子注射时代的批判性评估
J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):467-70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64504-x.
3
Comparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort?输精管结扎术后显微附睾精子抽吸术与重复显微重建后的卵胞浆内单精子注射/体外受精的比较:第二次输精管复通术值得一试吗?
Hum Reprod. 1998 Feb;13(2):387-93. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.2.387.
4
What is the best pregnancy rate that may be expected from vasectomy reversal?输精管复通术预期的最佳妊娠率是多少?
J Urol. 1993 Jun;149(6):1469-71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36417-0.
5
No differences in outcome of surgical sperm retrieval with intracytoplasmic sperm injection at different intervals after vasectomy.输精管结扎术后不同时间间隔进行睾丸切开取精术结合卵胞浆内单精子注射的结局无差异。
Fertil Steril. 2000 Jul;74(1):174-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00579-3.
6
Surgical sperm retrieval after previous vasectomy and failed reversal: clinical implications for in vitro fertilization.既往输精管结扎及复通失败后的手术取精:对体外受精的临床意义
BJU Int. 2002 Aug;90(3):277-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02843.x.
7
Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is an effective treatment for azoospermic patients with epididymal obstruction and prior failure to achieve pregnancy by sperm retrieval with intracytoplasmic sperm injection.显微镜下输精管附睾吻合术是一种有效的治疗方法,适用于因附睾梗阻而导致无精子症的患者,并且此前通过卵胞浆内单精子注射进行精子提取未能实现妊娠。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jan;29(1):1-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det385. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
8
Microsurgical vasovasostomy versus microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration/testicular extraction of sperm combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A cost-benefit analysis.显微外科输精管吻合术与显微外科附睾精子抽吸/睾丸精子提取联合卵胞浆内单精子注射的成本效益分析。
Eur Urol. 2000 May;37(5):609-14. doi: 10.1159/000020201.
9
Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group.输精管吻合术研究小组进行的1469例显微外科输精管复通术的结果。
J Urol Nurs. 1992 Apr-Jun;11(2):93-111.
10
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal?对于接受输精管切除术的男性,最佳的不育治疗方法是什么:辅助生殖还是输精管复通术?
Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2004 Oct;59(5):312-5. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812004000500016. Epub 2004 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After .比较. 前后的绝育率(包括无子女和无伴侣的情况)。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):15579883241260511. doi: 10.1177/15579883241260511.
2
Can we improve time to patency with vasoepididymostomy with an innovative epididymal occlusion stitch?我们能否通过一种创新的附睾结扎缝线来改善吻合术的通畅时间?
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Jul-Aug;50(4):504-506. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0222.
3
Is It Time for Andrology and Endocrinology Professionals in Assisted Reproduction Centers?
辅助生殖中心的男科与内分泌科专业人员的时代到了吗?
World J Mens Health. 2023 Oct;41(4):796-808. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.220253. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
4
Microsurgical Management of Male Infertility: Compelling Evidence That Collaboration with Qualified Male Reproductive Urologists Enhances Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Outcomes.男性不育的显微外科治疗:与合格的男性生殖泌尿科医生合作可提高辅助生殖技术(ART)成功率的有力证据。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 6;11(15):4593. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154593.
5
Survey of Microsurgery Training Availability in US Urology Residency Programs.美国泌尿外科住院医师培训项目显微外科培训可用性调查。
World J Mens Health. 2021 Apr;39(2):376-380. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.190162. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Successful unilateral vasectomy reversal in a lion ().一只狮子单侧输精管复通手术成功( )。 (括号内原文缺失具体内容)
Open Vet J. 2020 Jan;9(4):322-326. doi: 10.4314/ovj.v9i4.8. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
7
Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.输精管吻合术和输精管附睾吻合术:过去十年手术操作、结果以及通畅和妊娠预测因素的综述
Reprod Med Biol. 2018 May 22;17(4):343-355. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12207. eCollection 2018 Oct.
8
Office-based andrology and male infertility procedures-a cost-effective alternative.基于门诊的男科及男性不育治疗程序——一种经济高效的选择。
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Aug;6(4):761-772. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.34.
9
Factors to consider for informed consent prior to vasectomy reversal.输精管复通术前知情同意需考虑的因素。
Asian J Androl. 2016 May-Jun;18(3):372. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.179156.
10
Engaging practicing gynecologists in the management of infertile men.让执业妇科医生参与到不育男性的管理中。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015 Apr;65(2):75-87. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0623-3. Epub 2014 Nov 5.