Gardner D G
Division of Oral Pathology, University of Colorado, School of Dentistry, Denver 80262, USA.
J Oral Pathol Med. 1996 Nov;25(10):556-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1996.tb01731.x.
The author reviews current knowledge concerning the central odontogenic fibroma, which at present in incompletely understood, and reaches the following conclusions. 1) The separation of this lesion into simple and WHO types remains valid because they exhibit different histologic features. However, more care should be taken in rendering the diagnosis of the WHO type than in the past; unlike the simple type, it is a fibroblastic lesion. 2) Complex central odontogenic fibroma is a more appropriate term than the WHO type because the WHO does not use the latter term in its 1992 manual. 3) The microscopic distinction of simple odontogenic fibroma from desmoplastic fibroma remains difficult in some cases. 4) The granular cell odontogenic tumor, which has sometimes been referred to as a type of odontogenic fibroma, is a separate entity, although some simple odontogenic fibromas exhibit scattered granular cells. 5) The separation of lesions that have been reported recently as odontogenic fibromas with giant cell reactions from central giant cell granulomas that exhibit foci of odontogenic epithelium requires further study.
作者回顾了目前关于中央性牙源性纤维瘤的知识,目前对其了解尚不全面,并得出以下结论。1)将该病变分为单纯型和世界卫生组织(WHO)型仍然是合理的,因为它们表现出不同的组织学特征。然而,与过去相比,诊断WHO型时应更加谨慎;与单纯型不同,它是一种成纤维细胞性病变。2)复杂中央性牙源性纤维瘤比WHO型更合适,因为WHO在其1992年手册中未使用后一术语。3)在某些情况下,单纯性牙源性纤维瘤与促结缔组织增生性纤维瘤在显微镜下仍难以区分。4)颗粒细胞性牙源性肿瘤有时被称为牙源性纤维瘤的一种类型,它是一个独立的实体,尽管一些单纯性牙源性纤维瘤有散在颗粒细胞。5)最近报道的具有巨细胞反应的牙源性纤维瘤与表现出牙源性上皮灶的中央巨细胞肉芽肿之间的区分需要进一步研究。