• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定成功实施外倒转术的临床疗效及成本节约情况。

Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version.

作者信息

Mauldin J G, Mauldin P D, Feng T I, Adams E K, Durkalski V L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;175(6):1639-44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70118-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70118-7
PMID:8987953
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine predictors of successful external cephalic version and to calculate the associated cost savings achieved with success.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of 203 women with singleton gestations who underwent external cephalic version was performed. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed on patient-specific risk data to predict successful version. National claims data were used for the cost simulation.

RESULTS

Higher parity (p = 0.02), transverse-oblique presentation (p = 0.001), posterior placenta (p = 0.001), and a longer duration of pregnancy (p = 0.001) significantly increased the likelihood of a successful version. Heavier maternal weight was negatively associated with successful version (p = 0.05). The cost simulation revealed an average savings of $2462 for each successful version.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies clinical variables associated with an increased external cephalic version success rate. If, in fact, successful external cephalic version reduces both maternal and fetal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and, as demonstrated in this analysis, the costs associated with the delivery, then greater effort should be made to maximize the success rate of external cephalic version.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定外倒转术成功的预测因素,并计算成功实施外倒转术所节省的相关成本。

研究设计

对203名单胎妊娠且接受外倒转术的女性进行回顾性研究。对患者特定风险数据进行描述性、单变量和多变量分析,以预测外倒转术成功与否。使用国家索赔数据进行成本模拟。

结果

较高的产次(p = 0.02)、横位-斜位胎位(p = 0.001)、胎盘后置(p = 0.001)以及较长的孕周(p = 0.001)显著增加了外倒转术成功的可能性。孕妇体重较重与外倒转术成功呈负相关(p = 0.05)。成本模拟显示,每次成功的外倒转术平均节省2462美元。

结论

本研究确定了与外倒转术成功率增加相关的临床变量。事实上,如果成功的外倒转术能降低剖宫产相关的母婴发病率,并且如本分析所示,能降低分娩相关成本,那么就应做出更大努力以最大化外倒转术的成功率。

相似文献

1
Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version.确定成功实施外倒转术的临床疗效及成本节约情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;175(6):1639-44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70118-7.
2
Predictors of successful outcomes after external cephalic version in singleton term breech pregnancies: a nine-year historical cohort study.经外部头位翻转术矫正的单胎足月臀位妊娠结局的预测因素:一项九年历史队列研究。
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Feb;18(1):11-9.
3
Repeat external cephalic version. Is it worth the effort?重复外倒转术。值得这么做吗?
J Reprod Med. 1995 Nov;40(11):775-8.
4
Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis.外倒转术的椎管内阻滞:成本分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Jul;41(7):1023-31. doi: 10.1111/jog.12674. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
5
[External cephalic version].[外倒转术]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2016 Aug;84(8):507-13.
6
Anesthetic management of external cephalic version.经皮外倒转术的麻醉管理。
Clin Perinatol. 2013 Sep;40(3):399-412. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
7
Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States.足月臀位分娩的产妇结局:在美国全国范围内分娩入院样本中成功进行外倒转术的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 8;16(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0941-9.
8
External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.使用沙丁胺醇进行外倒转术——成功率及成功的预测因素
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Feb;19(2):91-4.
9
Lessons learned from a single institution's retrospective analysis of emergent cesarean delivery following external cephalic version with and without neuraxial anesthesia.从单一机构对有无神经轴索麻醉的外倒转术后急诊剖宫产进行回顾性分析中获得的经验教训。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017 May;31:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
10
Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;176(1 Pt 1):218-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)80040-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Simulation Model for External Cephalic Version.一种外倒转术的模拟模型。
Cureus. 2020 Dec 30;12(12):e12382. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12382.
2
Correlation of Obesity with External Cephalic Version Success among Women with One Previous Cesarean Delivery.既往有一次剖宫产史的女性肥胖与外倒转术成功率的相关性
AJP Rep. 2020 Jul;10(3):e324-e329. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715173. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials of Neuraxial, Intravenous, and Inhalational Anesthesia for External Cephalic Version.
椎管内麻醉、静脉麻醉和吸入麻醉用于经皮外转胎位术的临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Dec;131(6):1800-1811. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004795.
4
Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.外倒转术用于足月臀位分娩的成本效益分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Jan 21;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-3.
5
Central neuraxial blockade-assisted external cephalic version in reducing caesarean section rate: systematic review and meta-analysis.中枢神经轴索阻滞辅助外倒转术降低剖宫产率:系统评价与Meta分析
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2009;2009:718981. doi: 10.1155/2009/718981. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
6
A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital.在英国一家地区综合医院提供外倒转术的决策分析成本分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2001;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-1-6. Epub 2001 Jul 4.
7
Determining cost savings from attempted cephalic version in an inner city delivering population.确定在市中心分娩人群中尝试进行头位倒转术所节省的成本。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2000 Jun;3(3):185-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1019097525279.