• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵长类动物学中的几何形态测量学:智人与黑猩猩的颅面变异

Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes.

作者信息

Lynch J M, Wood C G, Luboga S A

机构信息

Department of Zoology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-0302, USA.

出版信息

Folia Primatol (Basel). 1996;67(1):15-39. doi: 10.1159/000157203.

DOI:10.1159/000157203
PMID:8990516
Abstract

Traditionally, morphometric studies have relied on statistical analysis of distances, angles or ratios to investigate morphometric variation among taxa. Recently, geometric techniques have been developed for the direct analysis of landmark data. In this paper, we offer a summary (with examples) of three of these newer techniques, namely shape coordinate, thin-plate spline and relative warp analyses. Shape coordinate analysis detected significant craniofacial variation between 4 modern human populations, with African and Australian Aboriginal specimens being relatively prognathous compared with their Eurasian counterparts. In addition, the Australian specimens exhibited greater basicranial flexion than all other samples. The observed relationships between size and craniofacial shape were weak. The decomposition of shape variation into affine and non-affine components is illustrated via a thin-plate spline analysis of Homo and Pan cranial landmarks. We note differences between Homo and Pan in the degree of prognathism and basicranial flexion and the position and orientation of the foramen magnum. We compare these results with previous studies of these features in higher primates and discuss the utility of geometric morphometrics as a tool in primatology and physical anthropology. We conclude that many studies of morphological variation, both within and between taxa, would benefit from the graphical nature of these techniques.

摘要

传统上,形态测量学研究依赖于对距离、角度或比例进行统计分析,以研究不同分类群之间的形态测量变异。最近,已经开发出几何技术用于直接分析地标数据。在本文中,我们提供了其中三种较新技术的概述(并举例),即形状坐标分析、薄板样条分析和相对扭曲分析。形状坐标分析检测到4个现代人类群体之间存在显著的颅面变异,与欧亚人群相比,非洲和澳大利亚原住民标本的面部相对前突。此外,澳大利亚标本的颅底弯曲程度比所有其他样本都更大。观察到的大小与颅面形状之间的关系较弱。通过对人类和黑猩猩颅骨地标进行薄板样条分析,说明了形状变异分解为仿射和非仿射成分的情况。我们注意到人类和黑猩猩在突颌程度和颅底弯曲程度以及枕骨大孔的位置和方向上存在差异。我们将这些结果与之前对高等灵长类动物这些特征的研究进行比较,并讨论几何形态测量学作为灵长类学和体质人类学工具的实用性。我们得出结论,许多关于分类群内部和分类群之间形态变异的研究将受益于这些技术的图形性质。

相似文献

1
Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes.灵长类动物学中的几何形态测量学:智人与黑猩猩的颅面变异
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1996;67(1):15-39. doi: 10.1159/000157203.
2
Facial orientation and facial shape in extant great apes: a geometric morphometric analysis of covariation.现生灵长类动物的面部朝向和面部形状:协变的几何形态测量分析。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057026. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
3
Effects of brain and facial size on basicranial form in human and primate evolution.脑与面颅大小对人类和灵长类进化中颅底形态的影响。
J Hum Evol. 2010 May;58(5):424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
4
Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans.大猩猩和人类颅骨个体发育轨迹的比较。
J Hum Evol. 2004 Jun;46(6):679-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.03.006.
5
Basicranial flexion, relative brain size, and facial kyphosis in Homo sapiens and some fossil hominids.现代人类和一些已灭绝古人类的颅底弯曲度、相对脑容量及面部脊柱后凸情况
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995 Dec;98(4):575-93. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330980413.
6
Virtual reconstruction of modern and fossil hominoid crania: consequences of reference sample choice.现代和化石类人猿颅骨的虚拟重建:参考样本选择的影响
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015 May;298(5):827-41. doi: 10.1002/ar.23104. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
7
The Neanderthal taxonomic position: models of intra- and inter-specific craniofacial variation.尼安德特人的分类地位:种内和种间颅面变异模型
J Hum Evol. 2003 Jan;44(1):107-32. doi: 10.1016/s0047-2484(02)00208-7.
8
Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional Procrustes analysis.现代人类和普通黑猩猩颅骨的个体发育研究:通过三维普氏分析重新审视幼态持续假说
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002 May;118(1):50-62. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.10044.
9
Shape of the piriform aperture in Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes, and modern Homo sapiens: characterization and polymorphism analysis.大猩猩、黑猩猩和现代智人的梨状孔形状:特征与多态性分析。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998 Jul;106(3):297-310. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199807)106:3<297::AID-AJPA3>3.0.CO;2-K.
10
Morphological integration of the cranium in Homo, Pan, and Hylobates and the evolution of hominoid facial structures.人类、黑猩猩属和长臂猿科颅骨的形态整合以及类人猿面部结构的演化
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017 Apr;162(4):732-746. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23163. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Landmark-based homologous multi-point warping approach to 3D facial recognition using multiple datasets.基于地标点的同源多点变形方法在多数据集三维面部识别中的应用
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2020 Jan 16;6:e249. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.249. eCollection 2020.
2
The shape of the hominoid proximal femur: a geometric morphometric analysis.类人猿近端股骨的形态:一项几何形态测量分析。
J Anat. 2007 Feb;210(2):170-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00688.x.
3
Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation.
几何形态测量学中滑动半地标方法之间的差异及其在人类颅面和牙齿变异中的应用。
J Anat. 2006 Jun;208(6):769-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00576.x.
4
Quantifying temporal bone morphology of great apes and humans: an approach using geometric morphometrics.量化大猩猩和人类的颞骨形态:一种使用几何形态测量学的方法。
J Anat. 2002 Dec;201(6):447-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00122.x.
5
A geometric morphometric study of regional differences in the ontogeny of the modern human facial skeleton.现代人类面部骨骼个体发育区域差异的几何形态测量学研究。
J Anat. 2002 Sep;201(3):211-29. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00092.x.
6
Visualizing patterns of craniofacial shape variation in Homo sapiens.可视化智人头面部形状变化的模式。
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 22;269(1493):801-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1960.