Fernandez E, Sheffield J
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275-0442, USA.
Headache. 1996 Nov-Dec;36(10):595-602. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1996.3610595.x.
This study investigated headaches parameters (frequency and intensity) in relation to (the number and severity of) two types of psychosocial stress: major life events (as assessed by a revised Social Readjustment Rating Scale) and minor daily hassles (as assessed by a revised Hassles Scale). Subjects were 261 volunteers reporting headache. Results revealed that both headache frequency and intensity were significantly predicted by daily hassles, in particular, the average severity of these hassles, but there was a negligible relationship between headache parameters and any of the life event measures. Furthermore, a significant relationship emerged between life events and daily hassles themselves. This fits with recent findings that life events (while exerting little direct effect on headache) may trigger a succession of hassles which culminate in headaches. Also, it is not the number of hassles, but the perceived severity of these hassles that best predicts headache frequency and intensity. Finally, though significant as predictors, daily hassles explained a small portion of the variance in headache, thus pointing to the host of other possible biological and psychosocial contributions to headache.
本研究调查了头痛参数(频率和强度)与两种心理社会压力(重大生活事件和日常小困扰)的(数量和严重程度)之间的关系:重大生活事件(通过修订后的社会再适应评定量表评估)和日常小困扰(通过修订后的困扰量表评估)。研究对象为261名自述有头痛症状的志愿者。结果显示,日常小困扰,尤其是这些困扰的平均严重程度,能显著预测头痛频率和强度,但头痛参数与任何一项生活事件指标之间的关系微乎其微。此外,生活事件与日常小困扰之间也呈现出显著的关系。这与最近的研究结果相符,即生活事件(虽然对头痛的直接影响很小)可能引发一系列最终导致头痛的困扰。而且,最能预测头痛频率和强度的并非困扰的数量,而是对这些困扰的感知严重程度。最后,尽管日常小困扰作为预测因素具有显著性,但它们仅解释了头痛变异的一小部分,因此表明还有许多其他可能的生物学和心理社会因素导致头痛。