Suppr超能文献

[在儿童斜视手术中,丙泊酚用于舒芬太尼辅助麻醉是否比异氟烷更具优势?]

[Does propofol have advantages over isoflurane for sufentanil supplemented anesthesia in children for strabismus surgery?].

作者信息

Wilhelm S, Standl T

机构信息

Abteilung für Anästhesiologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg.

出版信息

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Sep;31(7):414-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995950.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigates the effectivity and the incidence of side effects of sufentanil-supplemented propofol versus isoflurane anaesthesia in children undergoing elective strabismus surgery.

METHODS

130 children (aged 3-11; ASA I-II) were randomly allocated to one of four groups. In group 1 and 2, anaesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol and maintained with 15-20 mg/kg x h propofol and 30% O2 in air (group 1) or 10-15 mg/kg x h propofol in N2O (group 2). After induction with either 2 mg/kg propofol (group 3) or 5 mg/kg thiopentone (group 4), anaesthesia was maintained with 0.8-1.5 Vol% isoflurane and N2O in 30% O2 in these groups. All children were orally premedicated with midazolam and atropine and received a single dose of intravenous sufentanil (0.5 micrograms/kg) and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) prior to intubation. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and pulse oximetry were registered 5 min prior and after intubation as well as 10 min before and 5 min after extubation. The incidence of pain and involuntary movements during injection, oculocardiac reflex (OCR), laryngospasm and postoperative shivering were as well registered as the duration of the operation and the time of extubation. Episodes of nausea and vomiting were documented during 24 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

TIVA with Propofol resulted in a decreased heart rate (p = 0.002) and a higher frequency of OCR (p = 0.01) than thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthesia with a higher sensitivity of children younger than 6 years (p = 0.007) in all groups. There were no differences in extubation time between groups. The overall incidence of nausea (p = 0.002) and vomiting (p = 0.007) was lower in group 1 and 2 when compared to group 3 and 4.

CONCLUSION

Propofol as an induction agent of balanced anaesthesia fails to show advantages over thiopentone. During total intravenous anaesthesia propofol increases the risk of bradycardia especially in younger children. However, a significantly lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after TIVA with propofol and sufentanil, irrespective of N2O administration, may be an advantage over isoflurane anaesthesia in paediatric patients after strabismus surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查在接受择期斜视手术的儿童中,舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉与异氟烷麻醉的有效性及副作用发生率。

方法

130名儿童(年龄3 - 11岁;ASA I - II级)被随机分为四组。第1组和第2组,用2mg/kg丙泊酚诱导麻醉,并用15 - 20mg/kg·h丙泊酚及空气中30%氧气维持麻醉(第1组),或用10 - 15mg/kg·h丙泊酚及氧化亚氮维持麻醉(第2组)。在用2mg/kg丙泊酚(第3组)或5mg/kg硫喷妥钠(第4组)诱导后,这些组用0.8 - 1.5Vol%异氟烷及30%氧气中的氧化亚氮维持麻醉。所有儿童术前口服咪达唑仑和阿托品,并在插管前静脉注射单次剂量的舒芬太尼(0.5微克/千克)和阿曲库铵(0.5毫克/千克)。记录插管前5分钟和插管后、拔管前10分钟和拔管后5分钟的心率、平均动脉血压和脉搏血氧饱和度。记录注射时疼痛和不自主运动、眼心反射(OCR)、喉痉挛及术后寒战的发生率,以及手术持续时间和拔管时间。记录术后24小时内恶心和呕吐的发作情况。

结果

与硫喷妥钠/异氟烷麻醉相比,丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉导致心率降低(p = 0.002)和OCR频率更高(p = 0.01),在所有组中6岁以下儿童的敏感性更高(p = 0.007)。各组间拔管时间无差异。与第3组和第4组相比,第1组和第2组恶心(p = 0.002)和呕吐(p = 0.007)的总体发生率更低。

结论

丙泊酚作为平衡麻醉的诱导剂并未显示出优于硫喷妥钠的优势。在全凭静脉麻醉期间,丙泊酚增加了心动过缓的风险,尤其是在年幼儿童中。然而,无论是否使用氧化亚氮,丙泊酚和舒芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉术后恶心和呕吐的发生率显著降低,这可能是斜视手术小儿患者相对于异氟烷麻醉的一个优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验