Boer W H, Braam B, Fransen R, Boer P, Koomans H A
Department of Nephrology, University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kidney Int. 1997 Jan;51(1):44-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.6.
In previous studies high luminal concentrations of angiotensin II (Ang II) were found in rat proximal tubules. The physiological role of intraluminal Ang II remains to be established. In the present study, we investigated whether the luminal angiotensin II concentration in the proximal tubules ([Ang II]prox) can be modulated. Micropuncture studies were performed in control rats (C, N = 8) and rats subjected to acute volume expansion (VE, N = 8) or reduced renal perfusion pressure (RRP, N = 7). Changes in [Ang II]prox were compared to changes in whole kidney Ang II content ([ANG II]kidney) and the plasma concentration ([Ang II] plasma). In C rats, [Ang II]prox was 460 +/- 48 pmol/liter (10 to 20 times lower than hitherto reported), while [Ang II]kidney and [Ang II]plasma were 369 +/- 81 pmol/kg and 90 +/- 29 pmol/liter, respectively. In agreement with previous data, VE failed to suppress [Ang II]prox (674 +/- 132 pmol/liter), while at the same time [Ang II]kidney (42 +/- 10 pmol/kg) and [Ang II]plasma (12 +/- 3 pmol/liter) were markedly suppressed. This points to dissociated regulation of [Ang II] in the renal luminal compartment on the one hand and the extraluminal renal and systemic plasma compartments on the other hand. During RRP, [Ang II]prox increased significantly to 1675 +/- 465 pmol/liter. No dissociation between the three compartments was observed in this situation, as [Ang II]kidney (969 +/- 85 pmol/kg) and [Ang II]plasma (245 +/- 72 pmol/liter) increased in parallel. In summary, we confirm that Ang II is present in proximal tubules of rat kidneys at concentrations which exceed those in plasma. Its concentration could be modulated (approximately 3.5 increase) by reduction of renal perfusion pressure but not by acute volume expansion. In the latter condition, we observed a clear dissociation from Ang II generation in the extraluminal renal compartment, as whole kidney Ang II content was markedly suppressed.
在先前的研究中,发现大鼠近端小管中血管紧张素II(Ang II)的管腔浓度较高。管腔内Ang II的生理作用尚待确定。在本研究中,我们调查了近端小管中管腔血管紧张素II浓度([Ang II]prox)是否可以被调节。对对照大鼠(C组,N = 8)以及经历急性容量扩张(VE组,N = 8)或肾灌注压降低(RRP组,N = 7)的大鼠进行了微穿刺研究。将[Ang II]prox的变化与全肾Ang II含量([ANG II]kidney)和血浆浓度([Ang II]plasma)的变化进行比较。在C组大鼠中,[Ang II]prox为460±48 pmol/升(比迄今报道的低10至20倍),而[Ang II]kidney和[Ang II]plasma分别为369±81 pmol/kg和90±29 pmol/升。与先前的数据一致,VE未能抑制[Ang II]prox(674±132 pmol/升),而与此同时,[Ang II]kidney(42±10 pmol/kg)和[Ang II]plasma(12±3 pmol/升)被显著抑制。这表明一方面肾管腔隔室中[Ang II]的调节与另一方面肾外管腔和全身血浆隔室中的调节是分离的。在RRP期间,[Ang II]prox显著增加至1675±465 pmol/升。在这种情况下,未观察到三个隔室之间的分离,因为[Ang II]kidney(969±85 pmol/kg)和[Ang II]plasma(245±72 pmol/升)平行增加。总之,我们证实Ang II以超过血浆浓度的水平存在于大鼠肾脏的近端小管中。其浓度可通过降低肾灌注压进行调节(约增加3.5倍),但不能通过急性容量扩张进行调节。在后一种情况下,我们观察到与肾外管腔隔室中Ang II生成的明显分离,因为全肾Ang II含量被显著抑制。