• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性肺炎患者的出院决策。肺炎患者预后研究团队队列研究的结果。

The hospital discharge decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study.

作者信息

Fine M J, Medsger A R, Stone R A, Marrie T J, Coley C M, Singer D E, Akkad H, Hough L J, Lang W, Ricci E M, Polenik D M, Kapoor W N

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jan 13;157(1):47-56.

PMID:8996040
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hospital discharge decision directly influences the length of stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, yet no information exists on how physicians make this decision.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the factors physicians considered the factors responsible for extending length of hospital stay in clinically stable patients, and the outpatient medical services that would allow earlier hospital discharge for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

METHODS

Physicians responsible for the hospital discharge decision of patients with community-acquired pneumonia were asked to identify the factors responsible for extending stay in patients hospitalized beyond stability, and the medical services that could have allowed earlier hospital discharge to occur.

RESULTS

For the 418 eligible patients with community-acquired pneumonia identified during the study, 332 questionnaires (79%) were completed by 168 physicians. Physicians believed 71 patients (22%) were discharged from the hospital 1 day or more (median, 2.5 days) after reaching clinical stability. The most common factors rated as being "very important" in delaying discharge were diagnostic evaluation or treatment of comorbid illness (56%), completion of a "standard course" of antimicrobials (15%), and delays with arrangements for long-term care (14%). Among the 302 patients with available information on both length of hospital stay and stability at discharge, median length of stay was 7.0 days for the 29 low-risk patients hospitalized beyond reaching clinical stability and 5.0 days for the remaining 128 low-risk patients (P < .005); median length of stay was 12.5 days for the 42 medium- and high-risk patients hospitalized beyond reaching clinical stability and 8.0 days in the remaining 113 medium- and high-risk patients (P < .001). Frequently cited medical services that "probably" or "definitely" would have allowed earlier discharge to occur included availability of home intravenous antimicrobial infusion (26%) and home visits by nurses (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians believed that diagnostic evaluation or treatment of comorbid illness, completion of a standard course of antimicrobial therapy, and delays with arrangements for long-term care delayed hospital discharge in clinically stable patients. Addressing the efficiency of these aspects of inpatient medical care, as well as providing home treatment programs, could decrease the length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

摘要

背景

医院出院决策直接影响社区获得性肺炎患者的住院时间,但目前尚无关于医生如何做出该决策的信息。

目的

确定医生认为导致临床稳定患者住院时间延长的因素,以及可使社区获得性肺炎患者更早出院的门诊医疗服务。

方法

负责社区获得性肺炎患者出院决策的医生被要求确定导致病情稳定后仍住院的患者住院时间延长的因素,以及本可使患者更早出院的医疗服务。

结果

在研究期间确定的418例符合条件的社区获得性肺炎患者中,168名医生完成了332份问卷(79%)。医生认为71例患者(22%)在达到临床稳定后1天或更长时间(中位数为2.5天)出院。在延迟出院方面被评为“非常重要”的最常见因素是合并症的诊断评估或治疗(56%)、完成抗菌药物的“标准疗程”(15%)以及长期护理安排的延迟(14%)。在302例有住院时间和出院时稳定性信息的患者中,29例病情稳定后仍住院的低风险患者的中位住院时间为7.0天,其余128例低风险患者为5.0天(P<0.005);42例病情稳定后仍住院的中高风险患者的中位住院时间为12.5天,其余113例中高风险患者为8.0天(P<0.001)。经常被提及的“可能”或“肯定”能使患者更早出院的医疗服务包括家庭静脉输注抗菌药物(26%)和护士家访(20%)。

结论

医生认为合并症的诊断评估或治疗、抗菌药物标准疗程的完成以及长期护理安排的延迟会使临床稳定患者延迟出院。提高住院医疗护理这些方面的效率,并提供家庭治疗方案,可缩短社区获得性肺炎患者的住院时间。

相似文献

1
The hospital discharge decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study.社区获得性肺炎患者的出院决策。肺炎患者预后研究团队队列研究的结果。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jan 13;157(1):47-56.
2
The hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Results from the pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study.社区获得性肺炎患者的住院决策。肺炎患者预后研究团队队列研究的结果。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jan 13;157(1):36-44.
3
Declining length of hospital stay for pneumonia and postdischarge outcomes.肺炎患者住院时间缩短及出院后结局
Am J Med. 2008 Oct;121(10):845-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.010.
4
Preferences for home vs hospital care among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎低风险患者对家庭护理与医院护理的偏好。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 22;156(14):1565-71.
5
Azithromycin monotherapy for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a 31/2-year experience from a veterans affairs hospital.阿奇霉素单药治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者:一家退伍军人事务医院3.5年的经验
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1718-26. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1718.
6
Causes and risk factors for rehospitalization of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎住院患者再次住院的原因及危险因素。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 15;46(4):550-6. doi: 10.1086/526526.
7
Relationship of nutritional status to length of stay, hospital costs, and discharge status of patients hospitalized in the medicine service.内科住院患者营养状况与住院时间、住院费用及出院状态的关系。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Sep;97(9):975-8; quiz 979-80. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00235-6.
8
Association between timing of intensive care unit admission and outcomes for emergency department patients with community-acquired pneumonia.急诊科社区获得性肺炎患者重症监护病房入住时机与预后的关联
Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2867-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b02dbb.
9
Efficacy of exclusively oral antibiotic therapy in patients hospitalized with nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study and meta-analysis.单纯口服抗生素治疗非重症社区获得性肺炎住院患者的疗效:一项回顾性研究和荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 15;116(6):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.013.
10
Implementation of an inpatient management and discharge strategy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎患者住院管理与出院策略的实施
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Aug;11(8):491-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessing Halm's clinical stability criteria in community-acquired pneumonia management.重新评估社区获得性肺炎管理中 Halm 的临床稳定标准。
Eur Respir J. 2024 Nov 7;64(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00054-2024. Print 2024 Nov.
2
Ten Issues for Updating in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: An Expert Review.社区获得性肺炎更新的十个问题:专家综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 30;12(21):6864. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216864.
3
Clinical characteristics of nursing home-acquired pneumonia in elderly patients admitted to a Korean teaching hospital.
韩国一家教学医院收治的老年患者养老院获得性肺炎的临床特征
Korean J Intern Med. 2015 Sep;30(5):638-47. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.5.638. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
4
Improvement of CRB-65 as a prognostic tool in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.改善 CRB-65 在成人社区获得性肺炎中的预后评估作用。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2014 Jul 8;1(1):e000038. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000038. eCollection 2014.
5
New ways to look at old patterns? Sequence analysis to analyze patterns of clinical stability in community-acquired pneumonia.看待旧模式的新方法?通过序列分析来分析社区获得性肺炎的临床稳定性模式。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Apr;29(4):554-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2760-2.
6
Sequence patterns in the resolution of clinical instabilities in community-acquired pneumonia and association with outcomes.社区获得性肺炎临床不稳定状态缓解中的序列模式及其与预后的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Apr;29(4):563-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2626-7. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use in community acquired pneumonia.降钙素原指导社区获得性肺炎抗生素使用的成本效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Sep;28(9):1157-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2400-x.
8
Outcomes of early switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics on medical wards.内科病房从静脉注射抗生素早期转换为口服抗生素的结果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Jul;64(1):188-99. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp131. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
9
Summary of Canadian guidelines for the initial management of community-acquired pneumonia: an evidence-based update by the Canadian Infectious Disease Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society.加拿大社区获得性肺炎初始管理指南摘要:加拿大传染病协会和加拿大胸科学会基于证据的更新
Can J Infect Dis. 2000 Sep;11(5):237-48. doi: 10.1155/2000/457147.
10
Does physicians' case volume impact inpatient care costs for pneumonia cases?医生的病例数量会影响肺炎病例的住院护理费用吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Mar;23(3):304-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0462-3. Epub 2007 Nov 28.