Lip G Y, Zarifis J, Farooqi I S, Page A, Sagar G, Beevers D G
University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, England.
Stroke. 1997 Jan;28(1):31-5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.1.31.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) devices are increasingly used in the assessment of hypertension, but their value in patients after a stroke is unknown, despite the fact that hypertension is an important cause of stroke and many patients have relatively high blood pressure (BP) levels at presentation. We therefore investigated the clinical use of a 24-hour oscillometric ABPM device in patients after acute stroke. We also investigated ABPM in different types of stroke (thrombosis, hemorrhage, and transient ischemic attack) and ethnic and sex differences.
BP was measured manually with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer, and ABPM measurements were made with an oscillometric device. The first reading obtained with the ABPM device was compared with simultaneous manual BP measurements. Mean daytime and nighttime pressures were also analyzed to determine the frequency of nocturnal BP falls ("dipping").
We studied 86 patients (48 men; mean +/- SD age, 64.2 +/- 9.2 years) admitted with acute-onset stroke (ictus within 12 hours) in a district general hospital. Thirty-one patients (36.0%) had a previous history of hypertension. The median percentage of successful BP readings by ABPM was 92% (interquartile range, 72 to 98). There was no significant difference in manual BP levels compared with the first simultaneous systolic or diastolic ABPM measurements. Systolic BPs recorded by ABPM were significantly higher in black patients with acute stroke and in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, who also showed a trend toward higher nocturnal BPs. There was no difference in BPs between men and women and those who were alive or dead 6 months later (P = NS). There was also no difference between mean day and night systolic BP (mean difference, 1.9 mm Hg; P = .08), although mean daytime diastolic BP was higher than mean nighttime diastolic BP (mean difference, 2.4 mm Hg; P = .01). Patients with stroke therefore demonstrated a loss of diurnal BP rhythm and may be considered "nondippers"; there was also a trend toward "reverse dipping" in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.
This study demonstrates higher systolic BPs as recorded by ABPM (but not manually) in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage than in those with cerebral infarcts; higher levels were also found in blacks. ABPM recordings are useful in the assessment of BP in patients with stroke, who may be considered nondippers.
动态血压监测(ABPM)设备在高血压评估中的应用日益广泛,但尽管高血压是中风的重要病因,且许多患者在发病时血压(BP)水平相对较高,其在中风患者中的价值仍不明确。因此,我们研究了24小时示波法ABPM设备在急性中风患者中的临床应用。我们还研究了不同类型中风(血栓形成、出血和短暂性脑缺血发作)以及种族和性别差异中的ABPM情况。
使用标准汞柱式血压计手动测量血压,并使用示波设备进行ABPM测量。将ABPM设备获得的首次读数与同时进行的手动血压测量结果进行比较。还分析了日间和夜间平均血压,以确定夜间血压下降(“勺型”)的频率。
我们研究了一家地区综合医院收治的86例急性起病中风(发病在12小时内)患者(48例男性;平均±标准差年龄,64.2±9.2岁)。31例患者(36.0%)有高血压病史。ABPM成功测量血压的中位数百分比为92%(四分位间距,72%至98%)。与首次同时进行的收缩压或舒张压ABPM测量相比,手动测量的血压水平无显著差异。急性中风黑人患者和脑出血患者的ABPM记录的收缩压显著更高,这些患者夜间血压也有升高趋势。6个月后存活或死亡的患者之间以及男性和女性之间的血压无差异(P=无显著性差异)。尽管日间平均舒张压高于夜间平均舒张压(平均差异,2.4 mmHg;P=0.01),但日间和夜间平均收缩压之间也无差异(平均差异,1.9 mmHg;P=0.08)。因此,中风患者表现出昼夜血压节律消失,可被视为“非勺型”;脑出血患者还有“反勺型”趋势。
本研究表明,脑出血患者ABPM记录的收缩压(而非手动测量)高于脑梗死患者;黑人患者的血压水平也更高。ABPM记录有助于评估中风患者的血压,这些患者可被视为非勺型。