Eiselt J, Racek J, Holecek V, Krejcová I, Opatrný K
I. interní klinika LF UK a FN, Plzen.
Cas Lek Cesk. 1996 Nov 6;135(21):691-4.
Free radicals (FR) may cause lipid peroxidation and damage macromolecules and cellular structure of the organism, e.g. endothelium and erythrocytes. Some studies have shown that haemodialysis is connected with increased FR production. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of two dialysis membranes on lipid peroxidation and some antioxidant protective factors.
The authors followed nine patients treated in a regular dialysis programme. In a cross controlled study the patients underwent haemodialysis with the use of cellulose diacetate (CDA) and polysulfone (PS) dialysis apparatus. Malondialdehyde in plasma was determined as a marker of lipid peroxidation. The haemodialysis with CDA or PS did not result in increased malondialdehyde levels in min. 30 or at the end of the procedure. The antioxidant capacity of plasma decreased after haemodialysis in a similar way with both types of membranes (PS, 1.67 +/- 0.10 mumol/l versus 1.47 +/- 0.23, P < 0.05; CDA: 1.72 +/- 0.10 versus 1.55 +/- 0.12, P < 0.05). The selenium blood level did not change. Activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) in blood before the dialysis was higher in the observation with subsequent use of CDA than while using PS (38.6 +/- 9.4 versus 34.5 +/- 6.6, P < 0.05). In the cohort with polysulfone membrane GSHPx further decreased in min. 30 of haemodialysis (34.0 +/- 6.6 IU/g Hb versus 31.1 +/- 5.0, P < 0.05). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) was also higher in dialysis with CDA membrane that while using PS (846 +/- 171 IU/g Hb versus 522 +/- 141, P < 0.05).
The activity of antioxidant enzymes GSHPx and SOD was lower with polysulfone membrane than with the cellulose acetate membrane. GSHPx activity also further decreased from min. 30 of dialysis with the PS membrane. It may be due to increased production of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide during haemodialysis with the PS. Lipid peroxidation has not been proved to increase during haemodialysis with the CDA or PS membrane.
自由基(FR)可导致脂质过氧化,损害机体的大分子和细胞结构,如内皮细胞和红细胞。一些研究表明,血液透析与自由基产生增加有关。本研究的目的是评估两种透析膜对脂质过氧化和一些抗氧化保护因子的影响。
作者对9例接受常规透析治疗的患者进行了随访。在一项交叉对照研究中,患者使用醋酸纤维素(CDA)和聚砜(PS)透析设备进行血液透析。测定血浆中丙二醛作为脂质过氧化的标志物。使用CDA或PS进行血液透析在30分钟时或透析结束时均未导致丙二醛水平升高。两种类型的膜(PS,1.67±0.10μmol/l对1.47±0.23,P<0.05;CDA:1.72±0.10对1.55±0.12,P<0.05)血液透析后血浆抗氧化能力均以相似方式下降。血硒水平未改变。在随后使用CDA的观察中,透析前血液中谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSHPx)的活性高于使用PS时(38.6±9.4对34.5±6.6,P<0.05)。在使用聚砜膜的队列中,血液透析30分钟时GSHPx进一步下降(34.0±6.6IU/g血红蛋白对31.1±5.0,P<0.05)。使用CDA膜透析时超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)也高于使用PS时(846±171IU/g血红蛋白对522±141,P<0.05)。
聚砜膜的抗氧化酶GSHPx和SOD活性低于醋酸纤维素膜。使用PS膜透析30分钟后GSHPx活性也进一步下降。这可能是由于使用PS进行血液透析过程中超氧阴离子和过氧化氢产生增加所致。尚未证明使用CDA或PS膜进行血液透析期间脂质过氧化增加。