Neo J, Chew C L, Yap A, Sidhu S
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Am J Dent. 1996 Feb;9(1):15-8.
To determine the 18-month clinical performance of four tooth-colored restoratives in non-carious cervical lesions.
Buccal abrasion lesions in 83 teeth were restored with each of the following materials: Fuji Cap II, Fuji II LC, APH/Universal Bond 3, Lite Fil II A/Imperva Bond. Baseline and an 18-month recall was carried out using the Ryge (USPHS) method for retention, color match, marginal adaptation, cavosurface marginal discoloration, anatomic form and secondary caries.
The USPHS results (% alfa) for the four products were, respectively: color match (9%, 48%, 57%, 55%), marginal discoloration (71%, 76%, 52%, 50%), marginal adaptation (24%, 24%, 33%, 15%), anatomic form (67%, 86%, 95%, 45%) and retention (100%, 95%, 100%, 65%). Results indicated that (1) Fuji Cap II exhibited a poor color match at baseline (2) Color matching of Fuji II LC was comparable to the resin composites and (3) seven Lite Fil II/Imperva Bond restorations (35%) were dislodged after 1 1/2 years.
确定四种牙齿颜色修复材料用于非龋性颈部病变的18个月临床性能。
用以下每种材料修复83颗牙齿的颊面磨损病变：富士Ⅱ玻璃离子水门汀、富士Ⅱ型光固化玻璃离子水门汀、APH/通用粘结剂3、Lite FilⅡA/Imperva Bond粘结剂。使用Ryge（美国公共卫生署）方法进行基线检查和18个月的回访，以评估修复体的固位、颜色匹配、边缘密合性、洞缘边缘变色、解剖外形和继发龋情况。
四种产品的美国公共卫生署评估结果（α百分比）分别为：颜色匹配（9%、48%、57%、55%），边缘变色（71%、76%、52%、50%），边缘密合性（24%、24%、33%、15%），解剖外形（67%、86%、95%、45%）和固位（100%、95%、100%、65%）。结果表明：（1）富士Ⅱ玻璃离子水门汀在基线时颜色匹配较差；（2）富士Ⅱ型光固化玻璃离子水门汀的颜色匹配与树脂复合材料相当；（3）1年半后，7个Lite FilⅡ/Imperva Bond粘结剂修复体（35%）脱落。
