Bottenberg P, Gräber H G, Lampert F
Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Dent Mater. 1996 Mar;12(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80075-3.
This study was designed to assess: 1) the ability of several commercially available and laboratory-made acid etchants to penetrate occlusal fissures when used for pit and fissure sealing, and 2) the influence of adding a surfactant to the etchant on penetration of the sealer. Viscosity, surface tension and contact angle to enamel of the etchants were determined for each treatment, and these properties were related to the etchant's ability to penetrate fissures.
Penetration was assessed in an acrylic fissure model having a deep-narrow fissure using a microscope and a chronometer. Penetration depth was expressed as percentage of total fissure depth and was measured in intervals up to 90 s. Commercially available etching agents with different viscosities and two solutions of phosphoric acid (37%), one with and one without a surfactant, were tested. The etch pattern obtained on the fissure wall enamel of extracted teeth with some of these products was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. Eventually, the penetration depths of a composite sealer in fissures treated with a conventional etchant were compared to those after application of a surfactant-containing etchant on sections of extracted teeth.
None of the commercially available etchants studied were able to penetrate farther than 17% of the total fissure depth in the fissure model. The surfactant-containing etchant showed complete penetration within about 1 min and had a significantly lower surface tension and contact angle than the other products tested. Only the surfactant-containing etchant could produce a retentive pattern on the entire wall enamel of the fissure with the exception of locations blocked by debris and plaque. Fissures treated with this product prior to sealing showed a significantly deeper penetration of the sealer in deep-marrow fissures.
Surfactant-containing etchants with a low viscosity can penetrate completely into fissures and can produce an increased retentive and wettable surface which significantly increased sealant penetration into deep fissures.
本研究旨在评估:1)几种市售及实验室自制的酸蚀剂在用于窝沟封闭时穿透咬合面窝沟的能力,以及2)在酸蚀剂中添加表面活性剂对封闭剂渗透的影响。测定了每种处理的酸蚀剂的粘度、表面张力和与牙釉质的接触角,并将这些特性与酸蚀剂穿透窝沟的能力相关联。
使用显微镜和计时器,在具有深而窄窝沟的丙烯酸窝沟模型中评估渗透情况。渗透深度以窝沟总深度的百分比表示,并在长达90秒的时间间隔内进行测量。测试了具有不同粘度的市售蚀刻剂以及两种磷酸溶液(37%),一种含表面活性剂,一种不含表面活性剂。使用扫描电子显微镜评估了其中一些产品在拔除牙齿的窝沟壁牙釉质上获得的蚀刻图案。最终,比较了在拔除牙齿切片上用传统酸蚀剂处理的窝沟中复合封闭剂的渗透深度与应用含表面活性剂酸蚀剂后的渗透深度。
在所研究的市售酸蚀剂中,没有一种能够在窝沟模型中穿透超过窝沟总深度的17%。含表面活性剂的酸蚀剂在约1分钟内显示完全渗透,并且其表面张力和接触角明显低于其他测试产品。除了被碎屑和牙菌斑阻塞的部位外,只有含表面活性剂的酸蚀剂能够在窝沟的整个壁牙釉质上产生固位图案。在封闭前用该产品处理的窝沟在深髓窝沟中显示封闭剂的渗透明显更深。
低粘度的含表面活性剂酸蚀剂能够完全渗透到窝沟中,并能产生增加的固位和可湿润表面,这显著增加了封闭剂在深窝沟中的渗透。