Norton J A, Javadpour N
Am J Surg. 1977 Sep;134(3):404-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90416-0.
Although the ileal conduit is currently the most widely used method for urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration, reports continue to accumulate indicating the frequency of long-term complications. Four patients with failure of ileal urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for invasive pelvic malignancy are presented. All four patients had either multiple pelvic surgical procedures and/or pelvic radiation. Interposition of jejunum between the proximal ureters or renal pelvises and skin was performed with satisfactory results in all four. In patients with pelvic exenteration and failure of ileal urinary diversion this technic offers the following advantages over the conventional revision of the ileal conduit: (1) eliminates use of radiated small intestine which is subject to fistula formation and/or obstruction; (2) avoids the settling of the urinary conduit in the devitalized pelvic space with potential adhesions, fistula formation, or obstruction; (3) ensures proximal jejunal loop is away from area of potential tumor recurrence and field or previous or future radiotherapy; (4) eliminates the extensive dissection of the adherent ileal conduit and subsequent risk of avascular necrosis; and (5) bypasses the radiated fibrotic distal ureters.
尽管目前回肠代膀胱术是盆腔脏器清除术后患者尿路改道最常用的方法,但关于长期并发症发生率的报道仍在不断积累。本文介绍了4例因侵袭性盆腔恶性肿瘤行盆腔脏器清除术后回肠代膀胱术失败的患者。所有4例患者均接受过多次盆腔手术和(或)盆腔放疗。在所有4例患者中,均在近端输尿管或肾盂与皮肤之间置入空肠,效果满意。对于盆腔脏器清除术后回肠代膀胱术失败的患者,与传统的回肠代膀胱术修复相比,该技术具有以下优点:(1)避免使用易发生瘘形成和(或)梗阻的受辐射小肠;(2)避免尿路改道在失活的盆腔空间内沉降,减少潜在的粘连、瘘形成或梗阻;(3)确保近端空肠袢远离潜在肿瘤复发区域以及既往或未来放疗区域;(4)避免广泛分离粘连的回肠代膀胱术以及随后的无血管坏死风险;(5)绕过受辐射纤维化的远端输尿管。