• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 2: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery.新西兰优先标准项目。第2部分:冠状动脉搭桥手术。
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):135-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135.
2
An audit on access to coronary artery surgery within a health district using New Zealand priority criteria as a benchmark.以新西兰优先标准为基准,对某健康区冠状动脉手术的可及性进行的一项审计。
Public Health. 1999 Jan;113(1):13-7.
3
Waiting times and prioritization for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand.新西兰冠状动脉搭桥手术的等待时间及优先排序
Heart. 1999 Jun;81(6):586-92. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.6.586.
4
Life and death on the waiting list for coronary bypass surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术等待名单上的生死攸关
N Z Med J. 1997 Feb 14;110(1037):26-30.
5
The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview.新西兰优先标准项目。第1部分:概述。
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):131-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.131.
6
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New Zealand's Auckland region: a comparison between the clinical priority assessment criteria score and the actual clinical priority assigned.新西兰奥克兰地区的冠状动脉搭桥手术:临床优先级评估标准评分与实际分配的临床优先级之间的比较。
N Z Med J. 2006 Mar 10;119(1230):U1881.
7
New Zealand priority criteria project. Project has potential to improve patient care, but only with injection of funds.新西兰优先标准项目。该项目有改善患者护理的潜力,但前提是要注入资金。
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1131.
8
Priority points and cardiac events while waiting for coronary bypass surgery.等待冠状动脉搭桥手术期间的优先点数和心脏事件。
Heart. 1999 Apr;81(4):367-73. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.4.367.
9
Prioritisation and cardiac events while waiting for coronary bypass surgery in New Zealand.新西兰冠状动脉搭桥手术等待期间的优先排序与心脏事件
N Z Med J. 2000 Mar 10;113(1105):69-70.
10
Waiting for coronary bypass surgery. Observations from the sidelines.等待冠状动脉搭桥手术。旁观者的观察。
N Z Med J. 2000 Oct 27;113(1120):446-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography.制定需要冠状动脉血管造影术的患者的优先排序框架。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 3;21(1):1997. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7.
2
Patient Mix Optimization in Admission Planning under Multitype Patients and Priority Constraints.多类型患者和优先级约束下的入院规划中的患者组合优化。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Mar 18;2021:5588241. doi: 10.1155/2021/5588241. eCollection 2021.
3
Waiting for surgery from the patient perspective.从患者的角度等待手术。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2009;2:107-19. doi: 10.2147/prbm.s7652. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
4
Assessing the cost effectiveness of using prognostic biomarkers with decision models: case study in prioritising patients waiting for coronary artery surgery.使用预后生物标志物与决策模型评估成本效果:以确定等待冠状动脉手术患者的优先级为例。
BMJ. 2010 Jan 19;340:b5606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5606.
5
Are coronary angiograms of value in the risk stratification of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?冠状动脉造影对接受冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的风险分层有价值吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 May;91(4):330-5. doi: 10.1308/003588409X391901. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
6
Triage for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: do patients agree on who should come first?加拿大冠状动脉搭桥手术的分诊:患者是否就谁应优先接受治疗达成共识?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 25;7:118. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-118.
7
Variations in clinical decision-making between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons; a case for management by multidisciplinary teams?心脏病专家和心脏外科医生临床决策的差异;多学科团队管理的必要性?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Mar 3;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-1-2.
8
Mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) Glu504Lys polymorphism contributes to the variation in efficacy of sublingual nitroglycerin.线粒体乙醛脱氢酶2(ALDH2)Glu504Lys多态性导致舌下硝酸甘油疗效的差异。
J Clin Invest. 2006 Feb;116(2):506-11. doi: 10.1172/JCI26564. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
9
The Chaoulli challenge: getting a grip on waiting lists.乔利挑战:掌控等候名单。
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 2;173(3):271-3. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050812.
10
Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning.外科手术中的优先级设定:改进流程并分享经验教训。
World J Surg. 2003 Aug;27(8):962-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7100-y. Epub 2003 Jun 6.

新西兰优先标准项目。第2部分:冠状动脉搭桥手术。

The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 2: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

作者信息

Hadorn D C, Holmes A C

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):135-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135
PMID:9006478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2125624/
Abstract

Priority criteria developed during a national project were used to conduct an audit of all 662 patients on waiting lists for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand during spring 1996. Based on the observed distribution of priority scores, the cost of providing surgery to all patients down to various levels of priority was estimated. Descriptions incorporating life expectancy and quality of life implications of surgery were developed of the kinds of patients who would or would not receive surgery at each of several possible funding levels. Cardiologists and cardiac surgeons agreed that a threshold of 25 points was a reasonable clinical goal but to work with a threshold of 35, which can be sustained with current levels of funding. All agree that the gap between these clinically preferred and currently afforded thresholds is a subject for wider societal dialogue and decision. The ability to measure the size of the gap between clinical desirability and financial sustainability provides a new transparency to the problem of healthcare resource allocation.

摘要

在一个国家项目中制定的优先标准,被用于对1996年春季新西兰所有662名等待冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者进行审计。根据观察到的优先分数分布,估算了为不同优先级别以下的所有患者提供手术的成本。针对在几种可能的资金水平下,哪些患者会或不会接受手术,制定了包含手术对预期寿命和生活质量影响的描述。心脏病专家和心脏外科医生一致认为,25分的阈值是一个合理的临床目标,但实际操作中采用35分的阈值,因为在当前资金水平下可以维持。所有人都同意,这些临床偏好的阈值与当前所能达到的阈值之间的差距,是一个需要更广泛社会对话和决策的问题。衡量临床需求与财务可持续性之间差距大小的能力,为医疗资源分配问题提供了新的透明度。