Hadorn D C, Holmes A C
Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):135-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135.
Priority criteria developed during a national project were used to conduct an audit of all 662 patients on waiting lists for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand during spring 1996. Based on the observed distribution of priority scores, the cost of providing surgery to all patients down to various levels of priority was estimated. Descriptions incorporating life expectancy and quality of life implications of surgery were developed of the kinds of patients who would or would not receive surgery at each of several possible funding levels. Cardiologists and cardiac surgeons agreed that a threshold of 25 points was a reasonable clinical goal but to work with a threshold of 35, which can be sustained with current levels of funding. All agree that the gap between these clinically preferred and currently afforded thresholds is a subject for wider societal dialogue and decision. The ability to measure the size of the gap between clinical desirability and financial sustainability provides a new transparency to the problem of healthcare resource allocation.
在一个国家项目中制定的优先标准,被用于对1996年春季新西兰所有662名等待冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者进行审计。根据观察到的优先分数分布,估算了为不同优先级别以下的所有患者提供手术的成本。针对在几种可能的资金水平下,哪些患者会或不会接受手术,制定了包含手术对预期寿命和生活质量影响的描述。心脏病专家和心脏外科医生一致认为,25分的阈值是一个合理的临床目标,但实际操作中采用35分的阈值,因为在当前资金水平下可以维持。所有人都同意,这些临床偏好的阈值与当前所能达到的阈值之间的差距,是一个需要更广泛社会对话和决策的问题。衡量临床需求与财务可持续性之间差距大小的能力,为医疗资源分配问题提供了新的透明度。