• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview.新西兰优先标准项目。第1部分:概述。
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):131-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.131.
2
Prioritizing patients for elective surgery: a prospective study of clinical priority assessment criteria in New Zealand.为择期手术患者确定优先级:新西兰临床优先级评估标准的前瞻性研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Winter;19(1):91-105. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000096.
3
Explicit rationing of elective services: implementing the New Zealand reforms.选择性服务的明确配给:实施新西兰改革
Health Policy. 2005 Sep 28;74(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.12.011. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
4
Waiting lists. Listless feeling.等待名单。无精打采的感觉。
Health Serv J. 1998 Jul 16;108(5613):26-7.
5
Solving the surgical waiting list problem? New Zealand's 'booking system'.解决手术等候名单问题?新西兰的“预约系统”。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2000 Oct-Dec;15(4):259-72. doi: 10.1002/hpm.596.
6
Who should have priority for a knee joint replacement?谁应该优先接受膝关节置换手术?
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Apr;41(4):390-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.4.390.
7
The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 2: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery.新西兰优先标准项目。第2部分:冠状动脉搭桥手术。
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):135-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135.
8
Priority access criteria for elective cholecystectomy: a comparison of three scoring methods.择期胆囊切除术的优先准入标准:三种评分方法的比较
N Z Med J. 1998 Jun 26;111(1068):231-3.
9
Strategy to reformulate waiting lists. New Zealand has some suggestions for NHS priority system for elective surgery.重新制定等候名单的策略。新西兰对国民保健制度择期手术优先系统提出了一些建议。
BMJ. 1999 Jun 19;318(7199):1698. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7199.1698a.
10
Waiting for scheduled services in Canada: development of priority-setting scoring systems.在加拿大等待预约服务:优先排序评分系统的开发
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 Feb;9(1):23-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00377.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery.医患双方对白内障手术适宜性和优先排序的报告一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253210. eCollection 2021.
2
The SCQ-SCORE: initial validation of a new scoring system for elective stone surgery prioritization in the COVID-19 era.SCQ评分:COVID-19时代用于选择性结石手术优先级排序的新评分系统的初步验证
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(1):81-88. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0339.R1. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
3
Rethinking Elective Cataract Surgery Diagnostics, Assessments, and Tools after the COVID-19 Pandemic Experience and Beyond: Insights from the EUROCOVCAT Group.新冠疫情期间及之后对选择性白内障手术诊断、评估和工具的重新思考:来自欧洲白内障手术协作组的见解
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Dec 2;10(12):1035. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10121035.
4
Development and validation of a Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN-HN) in a scarce resource setting: Response to the COVID-19 pandemic.在资源匮乏环境下开发并验证头颈部癌症手术优先级和排序工具及导航辅助系统(SPARTAN-HN):对 COVID-19 大流行的应对。
Cancer. 2020 Nov 15;126(22):4895-4904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33114. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Space, place and (waiting) time: reflections on health policy and politics.空间、地点与(等待的)时间:关于卫生政策与政治的思考
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Jul;13(3-4):226-250. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000366. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
6
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' Cataract Surgery Commissioning Guidance: executive summary.皇家眼科医学院白内障手术委托指南:执行摘要
Eye (Lond). 2016 Mar;30(3):498-502. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.271. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
7
An evaluation of the discriminant and predictive validity of relative social disadvantage as screening criteria for priority access to public general dental care, in Australia.澳大利亚对相对社会劣势作为优先获得公共普通牙科护理筛查标准的判别效度和预测效度的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 4;14:106. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-106.
8
Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review.全髋关节和膝关节置换术需求的决定因素:系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 30;12:225. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-225.
9
A messy reality: an analysis of New Zealand's elective surgery scoring system via media sources, 2000-2006.混乱的现实:2000-2006 年通过媒体资源对新西兰选择性手术评分系统的分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2013 Jan-Mar;28(1):48-62. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2127. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
10
Waiting for surgery from the patient perspective.从患者的角度等待手术。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2009;2:107-19. doi: 10.2147/prbm.s7652. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

新西兰优先标准项目。第1部分:概述。

The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview.

作者信息

Hadorn D C, Holmes A C

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):131-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.131.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.314.7074.131
PMID:9006477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2125609/
Abstract

New Zealand restructured its health system in 1992 with the aim of achieving greater levels of assessment and accountability in the publicly funded health sector. A committee was established specifically to advise the minister of health on the kinds, and relative priorities, of health services that should be publicly funded. One of its projects has been to develop standardised sets of criteria to assess the extent of benefit expected from elective surgical procedures. These have been developed with the help of professional advisory groups using a modified Delphi technique to reach consensus. So far the committee has developed criteria for cataract surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, hip and knee replacement, cholecystectomy, and tympanostomy tubes for otitis media with effusion. These criteria incorporate both clinical and social factors. Use of priority criteria to ensure consistency and transparency regarding patients' priority for surgery is required for access to a dedicated NZ$130m (pounds 57m; US$90m) pool of money, created to help eliminate surgical waiting lists and move to booking systems. The criteria will also be used in surgical outcome studies, currently in the planning phase.

摘要

1992年,新西兰对其医疗体系进行了重组,目的是在公共资助的医疗部门实现更高水平的评估和问责制。专门成立了一个委员会,就应获得公共资助的医疗服务的种类和相对优先次序向卫生部长提供建议。其项目之一是制定一套标准化的标准,以评估择期手术预期的受益程度。这些标准是在专业咨询小组的帮助下,采用改良的德尔菲技术达成共识后制定的。到目前为止,该委员会已经制定了白内障手术、冠状动脉搭桥术、髋关节和膝关节置换术、胆囊切除术以及用于治疗渗出性中耳炎的鼓膜置管术的标准。这些标准纳入了临床和社会因素。要获得专门设立的1.3亿新西兰元(5700万英镑;9000万美元)资金池,需要使用优先标准来确保患者手术优先权的一致性和透明度,该资金池旨在帮助消除手术等候名单并转向预约系统。这些标准还将用于目前正处于规划阶段的手术结果研究。