Sanker S, Chandrasekharan U M, Wilk D, Glynias M J, Karnik S S, Husain A
Department of Molecular Cardiology, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 31;272(5):2963-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.5.2963.
Human chymase and rat chymase-1 are mast cell serine proteases involved in angiotensin II (Ang II) formation and degradation, respectively. Previous studies indicate that both these enzymes have similar P1 and P2 preferences, which are the major determinants of specificity. Surprisingly, despite the occurrence of optimal P2 and P1 residues at the Phe8 downward arrow and Tyr4 downward arrow bonds (where downward arrow, indicates the scissile bond in peptide substrates) in Ang I (DRVYIHPFHL), human chymase cleaves the Phe8 downward arrow bond with an approximately 750-fold higher catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) than the Tyr4 downward arrow bond in Ang II (DRVYIHPF), whereas rat chymase-1 cleaves the Tyr4 downward arrow bond with an approximately 20-fold higher catalytic efficiency than the Phe8 downward arrow bond. Differences in the acyl groups IHPF and DRVY at the Phe8 downward arrow and Tyr4 downward arrow bonds, respectively, are chiefly responsible for the preference of human chymase for the Phe8 downward arrow bond. We show that the IHPF sequence forms an optimal acyl group, primarily through synergistic interactions between neighboring acyl group residues. In contrast to human chymase, rat chymase-1 shows a preference for the Tyr4 downward arrow bond, mainly because of a catalytically productive interaction between the enzyme and the P'1 Ile5. The overall effect of this P'1 Ile interaction on catalytic efficiency, however, is influenced by the structure of the acyl group and that of the other leaving group residues. For human chymase, the P'1 Ile interaction is not productive. Thus, specificity for Ang II formation versus Ang II degradation by these chymases is produced through synergistic interactions between acyl or leaving group residues as well as between the acyl and leaving groups. These observations indicate that nonadditive interactions between the extended substrate binding site of human chymase or rat chymase-1 and the substrate are best explained if the entire binding site is taken as an entity rather than as a collection of distinct subsites.
人糜蛋白酶和大鼠糜蛋白酶-1分别是参与血管紧张素II(Ang II)形成和降解的肥大细胞丝氨酸蛋白酶。先前的研究表明,这两种酶具有相似的P1和P2偏好,这是特异性的主要决定因素。令人惊讶的是,尽管在血管紧张素I(DRVYIHPFHL)的Phe8→键和Tyr4→键(其中→表示肽底物中的裂解键)处出现了最佳的P2和P1残基,但人糜蛋白酶切割Phe8→键的催化效率(kcat/Km)比切割血管紧张素II(DRVYIHPF)中的Tyr4→键高约750倍,而大鼠糜蛋白酶-1切割Tyr4→键的催化效率比Phe8→键高约20倍。Phe8→键和Tyr4→键处的酰基分别为IHPF和DRVY,这一差异主要是人糜蛋白酶偏好Phe8→键的原因。我们表明,IHPF序列主要通过相邻酰基残基之间的协同相互作用形成最佳酰基。与人类糜蛋白酶不同,大鼠糜蛋白酶-1表现出对Tyr4→键的偏好,这主要是因为该酶与P'1 Ile5之间存在催化活性相互作用。然而,这种P'1 Ile相互作用对催化效率的总体影响受酰基结构和其他离去基团残基结构的影响。对于人糜蛋白酶,P'1 Ile相互作用没有活性。因此,这些糜蛋白酶对血管紧张素II形成与血管紧张素II降解的特异性是通过酰基或离去基团残基之间以及酰基与离去基团之间的协同相互作用产生的。这些观察结果表明,如果将整个结合位点视为一个整体而非不同亚位点的集合,则人糜蛋白酶或大鼠糜蛋白酶-1的扩展底物结合位点与底物之间的非加性相互作用能得到最好的解释。